|
© Bill Wink 2007 |
space
|
AGENDA 21=SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT=WORLD GOVERNMENT=LOSS OF
SOVEREIGNTY=NO CONSTITUTION=LOSS OF FREEDOM=NO AMERICA |
Space
|
|
|
SPACE
|
And
so through the night went his cry of alarm |
space
|
The Truth As I Know It
To Be Dear
Friend, During June 2005 I posted a piece called the “RED
PILL” I titled it the “RED PILL” because back then this
all seemed so unreal to be writing about and in the movie ‘THE MATRIX’ taking
the ‘RED PILL’ allowed you to see reality. Since then we have really gone down the rabbit
hole and we have discovered things about our country our parent’s generation
wouldn’t believe possible. Although our leaders have been speaking to us
about what was coming, we were not listening closely enough and we weren’t
thinking on a global scale so we could place real credibility on what they
were telling us. Now, today, we realize movies like THE MATRIX,
1984, and others were telling us of certain realities that could and do
exist. For over ten years I have been trying to show you
what I saw back then. And that was
that the world we were living in was not what we thought it was; and that
forces had been at work for over a century moving us toward a world oligarchy
ruled by collectivist. I’m
still struggling to get your attention, to raise the alarm. Today there is enough evidence readily available
for consumption that it will allow me to peal part of the onion away. I have always focused on the UNITED NATIONS’
AGENDA 21 because I consider it a malignant cancer that is very dramatically
eating away at the foundation of our country and now we are really beginning
to see that our freedoms are indeed on life support and we must act soon to
save our liberties or lose them forever. However, UNITED NATIONS’ AGENDA 21, even though
it is a major part of the plan for world governance is only one piece of the
puzzle. The Council on Foreign Relations
was spawned from the secret society created by Cecil Rhodes – which still
exists today, that originally it was a front for J.P. Morgan and Company, and
that its primary purpose is to promote world government based on the model of
collectivism. The
power centers of the United States – including both major political parties –
are controlled by members of the Council
on Foreign Relations. This, in turn, is controlled by a submerged Round Table Group, which is associated
with other Round Tables in other countries. These are extensions of a secret
society founded by Cecil Rhodes
and still in operation today. I
call it the Fabian Network, not because these people are members of the Fabian Society, for most of them
are not. It is because they share the Fabian ideology of global collectivism
and the Fabian strategy of patient gradualism. Is this reality? If I were in
your position, being exposed to all of this for the first time, I probably
would think, “Oh come on! This can’t be true! If it were, I would have read
about it in the newspaper.” Well,
before you dismiss it as just another conspiracy theory, I’d like to refer
you one more time to Professor Quigley. He said this: I
know of the operation of this network because I have studied it for twenty
years and was permitted for two years during the 1960’s to examine its papers
and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have
for much of my life been close to it and too many of its instruments. In
general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown.2 1 Quigley, Tragedy, pp. 1247–1248. Yes!
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is reality! These
people have no allegiance to the United States of America that our Founders
left for us, even the ones who claim to be Americans. The
United States Congress January 2011 had the United States Constitution and
its amendments read to them and by the weekend were calling for legislation
to curb free speech which lies at the very heart of our Republic. They
believe they are the chosen ones, (which they in fact are) the illuminated
ones and that it is their place in history to save the world from the
unwashed rabble of the masses. Long
after the earthquake in Haiti, tens of thousands are still suffering yet
money has not been an issue, so what’s the plan? Where are the illuminated ones that are
going to lead the world? What
happened to BILL CLINTON and GEORGE BUSH? One
must wonder, is what we are seeing happen in Haiti “the plan”, the plan for
saving the world from the unwashed rabble of the masses? Was our
failure in our response to Katrina part of the ‘plan’ too? How
about the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster, the delaying of reinstituting off shore
drilling and the sending of billions of dollars to Brazil’s oil
industry. Is this all part of the plan
of distribution of wealth?
ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI, National Security Advisor to President CARTER,
CFR member and first director of the Trilateral Commission and an American. He writes of a society controlled by power elite in his 1970 book, BETWEEN
TWO AGES: AMERICA'S ROLE IN THE TECHNETRONIC ERA. You will find much of today’s world in his
writings of 40 plus years ago. “The
technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled
society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by
traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous
surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files
containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files
will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. Today
we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites...[whose] ties
cut across national boundaries... It is likely that before long the social
elites of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist
or globalist in spirit and outlook.... Within
a few years the rebels in the more advanced countries who today have the most
visibility will be joined by a new generation making its claim to power in
government and business... accepting as routine managerial processes current
innovations such as planning-programming-budgeting systems (PPBS) ... A
national information grid that will integrate existing electronic data banks
is already being developed.... [the Internet] The projected world information
grid, for which Japan, Western Europe, and the United States are most suited,
could create the basis for a common educational program, for the adoption of
common academic standards.... The nation-state is gradually
yielding its sovereignty. ... In the economic-technological
field, some international cooperation has already been achieved, but further progress will require greater
American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present
relatively favorable American position. Winter, 1992-93 -- The CFR's
Foreign Affairs publishes Empowering the United Nations by U.N. Secretary
General Boutros-Boutros Ghali, who asserts: "It is undeniable that the
centuries-old doctrine of absolute and exclusive sovereignty no longer stands...Underlying
the rights of the individual and the rights of peoples is a dimension of
universal sovereignty that resides in all humanity...It is a sense that
increasingly finds expression in the gradual expansion of international
law...In this setting the significance of the United Nations should be
evident and accepted." July 18, 1993 -- CFR member
and Trilateralist Henry Kissinger writes in the Los Angeles Times concerning
NAFTA: "What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade
agreement but the architecture of a new international system...a
first step toward a new world order." August 23, 1993 --
Christopher Hitchens, Socialist friend of Bill Clinton when he was at Oxford
University, says in a C-Span interview: "...it is, of course the case
that there is a ruling class in this country, and that it has
allies internationally." October 30, 1993 --
Washington Post ombudsman Richard Harwood does an op-ed piece about the role
of the CFR's media members: "Their membership is an
acknowledgment of their ascension into the American ruling class [where] they
do
not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy for the United States; they
help make it." January/February, 1994 -- The
CFR's Foreign Affairs prints an opening article by CFR Senior Fellow Michael
Clough in which he writes that the "Wise Men" (e.g. Paul Nitze,
Dean Acheson, George Kennan, and John J. McCloy) have: "assiduously
guarded it [American foreign policy] for the past 50 years...They ascended to
power during World War II...This was as it should be. National security and the
national interest, they argued must transcend the special interests and
passions of the people who make up America...How was this small band of
Atlantic-minded internationalists able to triumph ...Eastern
internationalists were able to shape and staff the burgeoning foreign policy
institutions...As long as the Cold War endured and nuclear Armageddon seemed
only a missile away, the public was willing to tolerate such an undemocratic
foreign policy making system." 1994 -- In the Human
Development Report, published by the UN Development Program, there was a
section called "Global Governance For the 21st Century". The
administrator for this program was appointed by Bill Clinton. His name is
James Gustave Speth. The opening sentence of the report said: "Mankind's
problems can no longer be solved by national government. What is needed is a
World Government. This can best be achieved by strengthening the
United Nations system." 1995 -- The State of the
World Forum took place in the fall of this year, sponsored by the Gorbachev
Foundation located at the Presidio in San Francisco. Foundation President Jim
Garrison chairs the meeting of who's-who from around the world including Margaret
Thatcher, Maurice Strong, George Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev and others.
Conversation centers around the oneness of mankind and the coming global
government. However, the term "global governance" is now used in
place of "new world order" since the latter has become a political
liability, being a lightning rod for opponents of global government. 1996 -- The United Nations
420-page report Our Global Neighborhood is published. It outlines a
plan for "global governance," calling for an international
Conference on Global Governance in 1998 for the purpose of submitting to the
world the necessary treaties and agreements for ratification by the year
2000. You’ve heard of most of these different groups at
different times but you probably didn’t know they are the power brokers of
the World. WHO
RUNS THE WORLD? we
are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites...[whose] ties cut
across national boundaries... It is likely that before long the social elites
of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or
globalist in spirit and outlook.... ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI, 1970
The Council on Foreign Relations is an
independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher
dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business
executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders,
and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the
world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other
countries. Founded in 1921, the Council takes no
institutional positions on matters of policy. The Council on Foreign Relations' David
Rockefeller Studies Program — CFR's "think tank" — is composed of
about fifty adjunct and full-time scholars and practitioners (called
"fellows") The program focuses on the most significant
foreign policy issues facing the United States and the international
community today, including conflict in the Middle East, rising powers in
Asia, and globalization. The fellows' work covers all major geographical regions of the world
— Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, and the Polar regions
— as well as the following program areas: energy security and climate
change, global
health, international institutions and global governance, national security and
defense, science and technology, and U.S. foreign policy. In addition, the Studies
Program hosts two research centers: The Maurice R. Greenberg Center for
Geoeconomics and the Center for Preventive Action. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is first
and foremost a membership organization. With more than 4,300 members, CFR's
ranks include top government officials, renowned scholars, business leaders,
acclaimed journalists, prominent attorneys, and a host of distinguished
nonprofit professionals. http://www.cfr.org/about/membership/roster.html Bilderberg takes its name from the hotel in
Holland, where the first meeting took place in May 1954. That pioneering
meeting grew out of the concern expressed by leading citizens on both sides
of the Atlantic that Western Europe and North America were not working
together as closely as they should on common problems of critical importance.
It was felt that regular, off-the-record discussions would help create a
better understanding of the complex forces and major trends affecting Western
nations in the difficult post-war period. In short, Bilderberg is a small, flexible,
informal and off-the-record international forum in which different viewpoints
can be expressed and mutual understanding enhanced. Bilderberg's only
activity is its annual Conference. At the meetings, no resolutions are
proposed, no votes taken, and no policy statements issued. Since 1954,
fifty-seven conferences have been held. For each meeting, the names of the
participants as well as the agenda are made Public and available to the
press. There usually are about 120 participants of whom
about two-thirds come from Europe and the balance from North America. About
one-third is from government and politics, and two-thirds from finance,
industry, labour, education and communications. Participants attend
Bilderberg in a private and not an official capacity. The 58th Bilderberg Meeting will be held in
Sitges, Spain 3 - 6 June 2010. The Conference will deal mainly with Financial
Reform, Security, Cyber Technology, Energy, Pakistan, Afghanistan, World Food
Problem, Global Cooling, Social Networking, Medical Science, EU-US
relations. Approximately 130 participants will attend of whom about
two-thirds come from Europe and the balance from North America. The
Club of Rome is an independent, not-for-profit organization with an
international membership. It draws on the insights and expertise of its
members from all regions of the world, from different cultures and histories,
from different fields of science and public policy and from academia, civil
society and the corporate sector. Since its founding forty years ago, it has
been promoting interdisciplinary analysis, dialogue and action on the
fundamental, systemic challenges which are determining the future of
humanity. The work of the active, international members is
complemented by around 50 honorary members and 40 Associate Members and by
the activities of 33 National Associations throughout the world. It is launching a major international cooperative
programme on the broad theme: “A New Path for World Development.” This will
engage thinkers, practitioners and activists in key regions and countries to
undertake interdisciplinary and multicultural thinking on crucial global
issues. Experts, universities and organizations from major emerging
economies, such as Brazil, China, India, Nigeria and Russia will be engaged
in the programme, as will leading personalities from Europe, Japan and the
United States, and from Africa, East Asia, Latin America and the Middle East. 1.Environment and Resources:
This cluster relates climate change, peak oil, ecosystems and water.
Radical and rapid social and economic transformations will be needed to avert
runaway climate change and
ecological breakdown; 2. Globalization:
This cluster relates interdependence, distribution of wealth and income, demographic
change, employment, trade and finance. Rising inequalities and imbalances
associated with the present path of globalization risk the breakdown of the
world economic and financial systems; 3. World Development: This
cluster relates sustainable development, demographic growth, poverty,
environmental stress, food production, health and employment. The scandal of
abiding poverty, deprivation, inequity and exclusion in a wealthy world must
be corrected; 4. Social Transformation:
This cluster relates social change, gender equity, values and ethics,
religion and spirituality, culture, identity and behavior. The values and
behavior on which the present path of world development is based must change
if peace and progress are to be preserved within the tightening human and
environmental limits; 5. Peace and Security: This
cluster relates justice, democracy, governance, solidarity, security and
peace. The present path of world development risks alienation, polarization,
violence and conflict; the preservation of peace is vital in itself but is
also a precondition for progress and for the resolution of the issues which
threaten the future. Royal Institute of International
Affairs Chatham House, home of the Royal Institute of
International Affairs, is a world-leading institute for the debate and
analysis of international issues. Chatham House was founded in 1920 and granted its
Royal Charter in 1926. It is based in St James's Square in London. The
Chatham House Rule, famous worldwide for facilitating free speech and
confidentiality at meetings, originated here. Our mission is to be a world-leading source of
independent analysis, informed debate and influential ideas on how to build a
prosperous and secure world for all. Chatham House pursues this mission: by drawing on our membership
to promote open as well as confidential debates about significant
developments in international affairs and about the context and content of
policy responses; by producing independent and
rigorous analysis of critical global, regional and country-specific
challenges; by offering new ideas to
decision-makers and -shapers on how these could best be tackled from the near
to long term. 'Chatham House' is both the name of the building
and the name by which the Royal Institute of International Affairs is widely
known. In recognition of this, Council in 2004 decided
to adopt 'Chatham House' as the primary identity for the Royal Institute of
International Affairs, which remains the formal name for legal and financial
purposes. The Trilateral Commission was formed in 1973 by
private citizens of Japan, Europe (European Union countries), and North
America (United States and Canada) to foster closer cooperation among these
core industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership
responsibilities in the wider international system. Originally established for
three years, our work has been renewed for successive triennia (three-year
periods), most recently for a triennium to be completed in 2012 The “growing interdependence” that so impressed the
founders of the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s has deepened into “globalization.” Our membership has widened to reflect broader
changes in the world. Thus, the Japan Group has become a Pacific Asian Group,
including in 2009 both Chinese and Indian members. Mexican members have been
added to the North American Group. The European Group continues to widen in
line with the enlargement of the EU. We are also continuing in this triennium
our practice of inviting a number of participants from other key areas. http://www.trilateral.org/download/file/TC%20list%201-11.pdf You don’t need to understand how all of this
works you just need to accept it as the reality it is. And you must recognize
their plan for the future does not include the America you grew up in. Only
then, maybe you will be motivated to save the republic we call the United
States of America. So how do you stand up against all of this? Well, all of this is “collectivism” and the
opposite of collectivism is “individualism”. The purveyor of “collectivism” is socialism, the
purveyor of “individualism” is capitalism so you need to be able to tell the
difference so you can move to defeat collectivism and advance individualism
by defeating socialism and advancing capitalism. “Individualism” is the correct choice, the right
way, the way GOD intended and I say that because of the Ten Commandments. The Ten Commandments that were handed down to
mortal man were directed to each and every “individual”. The Ten Commandments
were not about the collective activities of man they were about the
individual activities of every man. Our founders knew and understood that,
that is why the Constitution is about protecting the rights of the individual
from the collective. INTRINSIC NATURE OF RIGHTS I believe that only
individuals have rights, not the collective group; that these rights are
intrinsic to each individual, not granted by the state; for if the state has
the power to grant them, it also has the power to deny them, and that is
incompatible with personal liberty. I believe that a just
government derives its power solely from the governed. Therefore, the state
must never presume to do anything beyond what individual citizens also have
the right to do. Otherwise, the state is a power unto itself and becomes the
master instead of the servant of society. SUPREMACY OF THE INDIVIDUAL I believe that one of the
greatest threats to freedom is to allow any group, no matter its numeric
superiority, to deny the rights of the minority; and that one of the primary
functions of just government is to protect each individual from the greed and
passion of the majority. FREEDOM OF CHOICE I believe that desirable
social and economic objectives are better achieved by voluntary action than
by coercion of law. I believe that social tranquility and brotherhood are
better achieved by tolerance, persuasion, and the power of good example than
by coercion of law. I believe that those in need are better served by
charity, which is the giving of one's own money, than by welfare, which is
the giving of other people's money through coercion of law. EQUALITY UNDER LAW I believe that all citizens
should be equal under law, regardless of their national origin, race,
religion, gender, education, economic status, life style, or political
opinion. Likewise, no class should be given preferential treatment,
regardless of the merit or popularity of its cause. To favor one class over
another is not equality under law. PROPER ROLE OF GOVERNMENT I believe that the proper
role of government is negative, not positive; defensive, not aggressive. It
is to protect, not to provide; for if the state is granted the power to provide
for some, it must also be able to take from others, and once that power is
granted, there are those who will seek it for their advantage. It always
leads to legalized plunder and loss of freedom. If government is powerful
enough to give us everything we want, it is also powerful enough to take from
us everything we have. Therefore, the proper function of government is to
protect the lives, liberty, and property of its citizens; nothing more. That
government is best which governs least.
G. Edward Griffin GOD HELP US SAVE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. © Bill Wink January 12, 2011 |
Free counters provided by Andale