Agenda 21 is not the “Bill of Rights”. It is not “The Declaration of Independence”. And it is not the “U.S. Constitution”. It has never been decided on by the American people that “Agenda 21” should be our new bible. Our guiding light into the 21st century. It is being pushed on us by a bunch of self righteous elitist like Nancy Pelosi. It empowers those who agree and indoctrinates those who do not, and you are going to think you are having a bad dream when it comes into your home.
© Bill Wink 2007
AGENDA 21=SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT=WORLD GOVERNMENT=LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY=NO CONSTITUTION=LOSS OF FREEDOM=NO AMERICA
so through the night went his cry of alarm
The Truth As I Know It To Be
During June 2005 I posted a piece called the “RED PILL”
I titled it the “RED PILL” because back then this all seemed so unreal to be writing about and in the movie ‘THE MATRIX’ taking the ‘RED PILL’ allowed you to see reality.
Since then we have really gone down the rabbit hole and we have discovered things about our country our parent’s generation wouldn’t believe possible.
Although our leaders have been speaking to us about what was coming, we were not listening closely enough and we weren’t thinking on a global scale so we could place real credibility on what they were telling us.
Now, today, we realize movies like THE MATRIX, 1984, and others were telling us of certain realities that could and do exist.
For over ten years I have been trying to show you what I saw back then. And that was that the world we were living in was not what we thought it was; and that forces had been at work for over a century moving us toward a world oligarchy ruled by collectivist.
I’m still struggling to get your attention, to raise the alarm.
Today there is enough evidence readily available for consumption that it will allow me to peal part of the onion away.
I have always focused on the UNITED NATIONS’ AGENDA 21 because I consider it a malignant cancer that is very dramatically eating away at the foundation of our country and now we are really beginning to see that our freedoms are indeed on life support and we must act soon to save our liberties or lose them forever.
However, UNITED NATIONS’ AGENDA 21, even though it is a major part of the plan for world governance is only one piece of the puzzle.
The Council on Foreign Relations was spawned from the secret society created by Cecil Rhodes – which still exists today, that originally it was a front for J.P. Morgan and Company, and that its primary purpose is to promote world government based on the model of collectivism.
The power centers of the United States – including both major political parties – are controlled by members of the Council on Foreign Relations. This, in turn, is controlled by a submerged Round Table Group, which is associated with other Round Tables in other countries. These are extensions of a secret society founded by Cecil Rhodes and still in operation today.
I call it the Fabian Network, not because these people are members of the Fabian Society, for most of them are not. It is because they share the Fabian ideology of global collectivism and the Fabian strategy of patient gradualism. Is this reality? If I were in your position, being exposed to all of this for the first time, I probably would think, “Oh come on! This can’t be true! If it were, I would have read about it in the newspaper.”
Well, before you dismiss it as just another conspiracy theory, I’d like to refer you one more time to Professor Quigley. He said this:
I know of the operation of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years during the 1960’s to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have for much of my life been close to it and too many of its instruments. In general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown.2
1 Quigley, Tragedy, pp. 1247–1248.
Yes! Ladies and Gentlemen, this is reality!
These people have no allegiance to the United States of America that our Founders left for us, even the ones who claim to be Americans.
The United States Congress January 2011 had the United States Constitution and its amendments read to them and by the weekend were calling for legislation to curb free speech which lies at the very heart of our Republic.
They believe they are the chosen ones, (which they in fact are) the illuminated ones and that it is their place in history to save the world from the unwashed rabble of the masses.
Long after the earthquake in Haiti, tens of thousands are still suffering yet money has not been an issue, so what’s the plan? Where are the illuminated ones that are going to lead the world?
What happened to BILL CLINTON and GEORGE BUSH?
One must wonder, is what we are seeing happen in Haiti “the plan”, the plan for saving the world from the unwashed rabble of the masses?
Was our failure in our response to Katrina part of the ‘plan’ too?
How about the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster, the delaying of reinstituting off shore drilling and the sending of billions of dollars to Brazil’s oil industry. Is this all part of the plan of distribution of wealth?
ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI, National Security Advisor to President CARTER, CFR member and first director of the Trilateral Commission and an American.
He writes of a society controlled by power elite in his 1970 book, BETWEEN TWO AGES: AMERICA'S ROLE IN THE TECHNETRONIC ERA. You will find much of today’s world in his writings of 40 plus years ago.
“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.
Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites...[whose] ties cut across national boundaries... It is likely that before long the social elites of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and outlook....
Within a few years the rebels in the more advanced countries who today have the most visibility will be joined by a new generation making its claim to power in government and business... accepting as routine managerial processes current innovations such as planning-programming-budgeting systems (PPBS) ... A national information grid that will integrate existing electronic data banks is already being developed.... [the Internet] The projected world information grid, for which Japan, Western Europe, and the United States are most suited, could create the basis for a common educational program, for the adoption of common academic standards....
The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty. ... In the economic-technological field, some international cooperation has already been achieved, but further progress will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position.
Winter, 1992-93 -- The CFR's Foreign Affairs publishes Empowering the United Nations by U.N. Secretary General Boutros-Boutros Ghali, who asserts: "It is undeniable that the centuries-old doctrine of absolute and exclusive sovereignty no longer stands...Underlying the rights of the individual and the rights of peoples is a dimension of universal sovereignty that resides in all humanity...It is a sense that increasingly finds expression in the gradual expansion of international law...In this setting the significance of the United Nations should be evident and accepted."
July 18, 1993 -- CFR member and Trilateralist Henry Kissinger writes in the Los Angeles Times concerning NAFTA: "What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system...a first step toward a new world order."
August 23, 1993 -- Christopher Hitchens, Socialist friend of Bill Clinton when he was at Oxford University, says in a C-Span interview: "...it is, of course the case that there is a ruling class in this country, and that it has allies internationally."
October 30, 1993 -- Washington Post ombudsman Richard Harwood does an op-ed piece about the role of the CFR's media members: "Their membership is an acknowledgment of their ascension into the American ruling class [where] they do not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy for the United States; they help make it."
January/February, 1994 -- The CFR's Foreign Affairs prints an opening article by CFR Senior Fellow Michael Clough in which he writes that the "Wise Men" (e.g. Paul Nitze, Dean Acheson, George Kennan, and John J. McCloy) have: "assiduously guarded it [American foreign policy] for the past 50 years...They ascended to power during World War II...This was as it should be. National security and the national interest, they argued must transcend the special interests and passions of the people who make up America...How was this small band of Atlantic-minded internationalists able to triumph ...Eastern internationalists were able to shape and staff the burgeoning foreign policy institutions...As long as the Cold War endured and nuclear Armageddon seemed only a missile away, the public was willing to tolerate such an undemocratic foreign policy making system."
1994 -- In the Human Development Report, published by the UN Development Program, there was a section called "Global Governance For the 21st Century". The administrator for this program was appointed by Bill Clinton. His name is James Gustave Speth. The opening sentence of the report said: "Mankind's problems can no longer be solved by national government. What is needed is a World Government. This can best be achieved by strengthening the United Nations system."
1995 -- The State of the World Forum took place in the fall of this year, sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation located at the Presidio in San Francisco. Foundation President Jim Garrison chairs the meeting of who's-who from around the world including Margaret Thatcher, Maurice Strong, George Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev and others. Conversation centers around the oneness of mankind and the coming global government. However, the term "global governance" is now used in place of "new world order" since the latter has become a political liability, being a lightning rod for opponents of global government.
1996 -- The United Nations 420-page report Our Global Neighborhood is published. It outlines a plan for "global governance," calling for an international Conference on Global Governance in 1998 for the purpose of submitting to the world the necessary treaties and agreements for ratification by the year 2000.
You’ve heard of most of these different groups at different times but you probably didn’t know they are the power brokers of the World.
WHO RUNS THE WORLD?
we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites...[whose] ties cut across national boundaries... It is likely that before long the social elites of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and outlook.... ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI, 1970
The Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries.
Founded in 1921, the Council takes no institutional positions on matters of policy.
The Council on Foreign Relations' David Rockefeller Studies Program — CFR's "think tank" — is composed of about fifty adjunct and full-time scholars and practitioners (called "fellows")
The program focuses on the most significant foreign policy issues facing the United States and the international community today, including conflict in the Middle East, rising powers in Asia, and globalization. The fellows' work covers all major geographical regions of the world — Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, and the Polar regions — as well as the following program areas: energy security and climate change, global health, international institutions and global governance, national security and defense, science and technology, and U.S. foreign policy. In addition, the Studies Program hosts two research centers: The Maurice R. Greenberg Center for Geoeconomics and the Center for Preventive Action.
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is first and foremost a membership organization. With more than 4,300 members, CFR's ranks include top government officials, renowned scholars, business leaders, acclaimed journalists, prominent attorneys, and a host of distinguished nonprofit professionals.
Bilderberg takes its name from the hotel in Holland, where the first meeting took place in May 1954. That pioneering meeting grew out of the concern expressed by leading citizens on both sides of the Atlantic that Western Europe and North America were not working together as closely as they should on common problems of critical importance. It was felt that regular, off-the-record discussions would help create a better understanding of the complex forces and major trends affecting Western nations in the difficult post-war period.
In short, Bilderberg is a small, flexible, informal and off-the-record international forum in which different viewpoints can be expressed and mutual understanding enhanced. Bilderberg's only activity is its annual Conference. At the meetings, no resolutions are proposed, no votes taken, and no policy statements issued. Since 1954, fifty-seven conferences have been held. For each meeting, the names of the participants as well as the agenda are made Public and available to the press.
There usually are about 120 participants of whom about two-thirds come from Europe and the balance from North America. About one-third is from government and politics, and two-thirds from finance, industry, labour, education and communications. Participants attend Bilderberg in a private and not an official capacity.
The 58th Bilderberg Meeting will be held in Sitges, Spain 3 - 6 June 2010. The Conference will deal mainly with Financial Reform, Security, Cyber Technology, Energy, Pakistan, Afghanistan, World Food Problem, Global Cooling, Social Networking, Medical Science, EU-US relations. Approximately 130 participants will attend of whom about two-thirds come from Europe and the balance from North America.
The Club of Rome is an independent, not-for-profit organization with an international membership. It draws on the insights and expertise of its members from all regions of the world, from different cultures and histories, from different fields of science and public policy and from academia, civil society and the corporate sector. Since its founding forty years ago, it has been promoting interdisciplinary analysis, dialogue and action on the fundamental, systemic challenges which are determining the future of humanity.
The work of the active, international members is complemented by around 50 honorary members and 40 Associate Members and by the activities of 33 National Associations throughout the world.
It is launching a major international cooperative programme on the broad theme: “A New Path for World Development.” This will engage thinkers, practitioners and activists in key regions and countries to undertake interdisciplinary and multicultural thinking on crucial global issues. Experts, universities and organizations from major emerging economies, such as Brazil, China, India, Nigeria and Russia will be engaged in the programme, as will leading personalities from Europe, Japan and the United States, and from Africa, East Asia, Latin America and the Middle East.
1.Environment and Resources: This cluster relates climate change, peak oil, ecosystems and water. Radical and rapid social and economic transformations will be needed to avert runaway climate change and ecological breakdown;
2. Globalization: This cluster relates interdependence, distribution of wealth and income, demographic change, employment, trade and finance. Rising inequalities and imbalances associated with the present path of globalization risk the breakdown of the world economic and financial systems;
3. World Development: This cluster relates sustainable development, demographic growth, poverty, environmental stress, food production, health and employment. The scandal of abiding poverty, deprivation, inequity and exclusion in a wealthy world must be corrected;
4. Social Transformation: This cluster relates social change, gender equity, values and ethics, religion and spirituality, culture, identity and behavior. The values and behavior on which the present path of world development is based must change if peace and progress are to be preserved within the tightening human and environmental limits;
5. Peace and Security: This cluster relates justice, democracy, governance, solidarity, security and peace. The present path of world development risks alienation, polarization, violence and conflict; the preservation of peace is vital in itself but is also a precondition for progress and for the resolution of the issues which threaten the future.
Chatham House, home of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, is a world-leading institute for the debate and analysis of international issues.
Chatham House was founded in 1920 and granted its Royal Charter in 1926. It is based in St James's Square in London. The Chatham House Rule, famous worldwide for facilitating free speech and confidentiality at meetings, originated here.
Our mission is to be a world-leading source of independent analysis, informed debate and influential ideas on how to build a prosperous and secure world for all.
Chatham House pursues this mission:
by drawing on our membership to promote open as well as confidential debates about significant developments in international affairs and about the context and content of policy responses;
by producing independent and rigorous analysis of critical global, regional and country-specific challenges;
by offering new ideas to decision-makers and -shapers on how these could best be tackled from the near to long term.
'Chatham House' is both the name of the building and the name by which the Royal Institute of International Affairs is widely known.
In recognition of this, Council in 2004 decided to adopt 'Chatham House' as the primary identity for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, which remains the formal name for legal and financial purposes.
The Trilateral Commission was formed in 1973 by private citizens of Japan, Europe (European Union countries), and North America (United States and Canada) to foster closer cooperation among these core industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system. Originally established for three years, our work has been renewed for successive triennia (three-year periods), most recently for a triennium to be completed in 2012
The “growing interdependence” that so impressed the founders of the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s has deepened into “globalization.”
Our membership has widened to reflect broader changes in the world. Thus, the Japan Group has become a Pacific Asian Group, including in 2009 both Chinese and Indian members. Mexican members have been added to the North American Group. The European Group continues to widen in line with the enlargement of the EU. We are also continuing in this triennium our practice of inviting a number of participants from other key areas.
You don’t need to understand how all of this works you just need to accept it as the reality it is. And you must recognize their plan for the future does not include the America you grew up in. Only then, maybe you will be motivated to save the republic we call the United States of America.
So how do you stand up against all of this?
Well, all of this is “collectivism” and the opposite of collectivism is “individualism”.
The purveyor of “collectivism” is socialism, the purveyor of “individualism” is capitalism so you need to be able to tell the difference so you can move to defeat collectivism and advance individualism by defeating socialism and advancing capitalism.
“Individualism” is the correct choice, the right way, the way GOD intended and I say that because of the Ten Commandments.
The Ten Commandments that were handed down to mortal man were directed to each and every “individual”. The Ten Commandments were not about the collective activities of man they were about the individual activities of every man. Our founders knew and understood that, that is why the Constitution is about protecting the rights of the individual from the collective.
INTRINSIC NATURE OF RIGHTS
I believe that only individuals have rights, not the collective group; that these rights are intrinsic to each individual, not granted by the state; for if the state has the power to grant them, it also has the power to deny them, and that is incompatible with personal liberty.
I believe that a just government derives its power solely from the governed. Therefore, the state must never presume to do anything beyond what individual citizens also have the right to do. Otherwise, the state is a power unto itself and becomes the master instead of the servant of society.
SUPREMACY OF THE INDIVIDUAL
I believe that one of the greatest threats to freedom is to allow any group, no matter its numeric superiority, to deny the rights of the minority; and that one of the primary functions of just government is to protect each individual from the greed and passion of the majority.
FREEDOM OF CHOICE
I believe that desirable social and economic objectives are better achieved by voluntary action than by coercion of law. I believe that social tranquility and brotherhood are better achieved by tolerance, persuasion, and the power of good example than by coercion of law. I believe that those in need are better served by charity, which is the giving of one's own money, than by welfare, which is the giving of other people's money through coercion of law.
EQUALITY UNDER LAW
I believe that all citizens should be equal under law, regardless of their national origin, race, religion, gender, education, economic status, life style, or political opinion. Likewise, no class should be given preferential treatment, regardless of the merit or popularity of its cause. To favor one class over another is not equality under law.
PROPER ROLE OF GOVERNMENT
I believe that the proper role of government is negative, not positive; defensive, not aggressive. It is to protect, not to provide; for if the state is granted the power to provide for some, it must also be able to take from others, and once that power is granted, there are those who will seek it for their advantage. It always leads to legalized plunder and loss of freedom. If government is powerful enough to give us everything we want, it is also powerful enough to take from us everything we have. Therefore, the proper function of government is to protect the lives, liberty, and property of its citizens; nothing more. That government is best which governs least. G. Edward Griffin
GOD HELP US SAVE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
© Bill Wink January 12, 2011
Free counters provided by Andale