May 2022
























33 degree FREE MASONS









These few just come to mind. Those located in the USA make up the “deep state”.

Those in Europe, Canada, Asia, South America, Africa are the Khazarian Mafia  which the ‘deep state’ is part of.


Their ultimate goal -  One World Order by 2030

One world, one government, one religion, one money, one people but two classes. The elites and the rest of us. The useless eaters. Eventually humans will be like cattle.


They hope to accomplish this with their “Great Reset”, presented as the result of COVID-19, (that they developed and turned loose on the world,) that would install these concepts.


One world = no borders. We are experiencing this fact today. Next could be their concept of ‘one money’. A reset in global currency. But this is where it gets sticky.





The worldwide Alliance


Has been aware of the Black Hats’ plan for many years. In fact they have the play book. Plus, they have the knowledge that evil’s time has run out.


The “Great Reset’s” currency reset is no different than what we have now. It’s all funny money, Monopoly money, based on what they tell you it is based on. Uh, nothing. However, it would be digital and traceable so they can approve or disapprove of your purpose.


Where it gets a little bit murky is when we learn the “Good Guys’” plan has some similarities but the major difference is who/what controls you and your assets.


You can see the Bad Guys want to control every aspect of your and everyone else’s life and will be done by you having nothing and they control everything. And their digital currency is backed by nothing but air.


The Good Guys digital currency will be asset backed giving it real value. It will be backed by commodities. Hard assets. And if as promised you and you alone will have complete say-so over any money transaction world-wide. This will be accomplished through the Quantum Financial System. Or QFS.


Everyone would have a quantum phone (including this dinosaur) from which they will run their world including voting.










Yuval Noah Harari | What to Do With All of These Useless People? 

YNH is a lead advisor to Klaus Schwab. KS is the author of COVID-19 / The Great Reset and the Founder of the World Economic Forum. YNH is praised by the likes of Klaus Schwab, Barack Obama, Mark Zuckerberg, and Bill Gates


“The biggest question.. what to do with all these USELESS people. The problem is boredom & what to do with them.. when they are.. WORTHLESS. My best guess.. is a combination of DRUGS & COMPUTER GAMES”








As we all go through our mental gyrations, regarding the slaughter of innocent school children, we struggle to try and make sense of such a senseless act. Children killing other children. I wonder, could it be the results of such a heinous act were not directed toward the children, as they are no longer with us, but at a society that has somehow fostered this reaction? Or is it something else?


“Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez blasted patriarchal values and predatory behavior against minorities as she railed against the forces she said were behind the massacre in Uvalde.


'It's really important that we understand the roots of this,' she said.


'The vast majority of mass shooters are young men that have a very troubling history with women almost every single time.


'There is violence against women that immediately predates the you know this violence. This shooter in Texas, shot his own grandmother.


'We've seen a pattern here with this.'”


There is definitely a pattern here but I see it much differently than AOC. I also agree with her that 'It's really important that we understand the roots of this,' However, I don’t believe she is willing to tell the truth regarding the “roots”.




Before a person can wrap their mind around the root cause of such a despicable act as the murder of innocents, they must be fully aware and conscious of the evil we are dealing with.


As I’ve said before, this evil has no soul, no compassion, a heart of stone. If a few dead school children will advance their agenda, “what difference does it make”.


I’m not really as old as a dinosaur, but almost, and therefore, I remember when we carried guns to school in our cars and knives in our pockets and disagreements were settled with our fists. Been there, done that. Hurts. But I knew of no one whose hatred was at the level that they wanted to kill someone. This was 1960s America. So what happened?


In my opinion, we arrived here by design. This, today, yesterday and days before are the result of the ‘counter culture’. Those who promoted the assault on America’s culture. America’s culture was as I described and it has been changed to what it has become today.


Those of us who lived in an America that was far less violent could not understand the “if it feels good – do it” culture that spawned the likes of Charles Manson, Dr. Timothy Leary, LSD and an entire underground community that focused on changing our culture. “Turn on, tune in, drop out.”


These turned into turbulent times and when we came out the other side we had experienced violence on a scale we had never seen. The seeds to destroy America had been planted and were bearing fruit.


Many faces that fomented this attack on America’s culture are still with us today. George Soros, Aryeh Neier, Jane Fonda, Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn and many more.


Aryeh Neier established a radical organization in late 1959 named Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). The group was developed from the Student League for Industrial Democracy, the youth branch of the socialist League for Industrial Democracy.  SDS held its first meeting in Ann Arbor, Michigan in 1960. SDS’s first impress on the political landscape was the Port Huron Statement of 1962, drafted principally by Tom Hayden, (who was married to Jane Fonda and became a member of the California legislature) a former editor of the University of Michigan's student newspaper.


The Port Huron Statement spotlights their radical position.  The statement determined that race and alienation were the two major flashpoints to exploit for their vision of a better America.


George Soros is founder of the Open Society Institute (OSI).


Aryeh Neier went on to become the President of the Open Society Institute and the Soros Foundation Network. Many more went on to become part of the ‘deep state’.


Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn were neighbors and good friends of the Obamas in Chicago.


Bill Cooper, former United States Naval Intelligence Briefing Team member, reveals information that remains hidden from the public eye. This information has been kept in top-secret government files since the 1940s. His audiences hear the truth unfold as he writes about the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the war on drugs, the secret government, and UFOs.


He writes about the connection between mass shootings and the public demand for gun control in has 1991 book “Behold A Pale Horse”


“The government encouraged the manufacture and importation of military firearms for the criminals to use. This is intended to foster a feeling of insecurity which would lead the American people to voluntarily disarm themselves by passing laws against firearms. Using drugs and hypnosis on mental patients in a process called Orion, the CIA included the desire in these people to open fire on schoolyards and thus inflame the antigun lobby. This plan is well under way and so far is working perfectly. The middle class is begging the government to do away with the 2nd amendment.”




In 1764, three men entered a schoolhouse near present-day Greencastle, Pennsylvania, and reportedly killed 10 people. It wasn't until 1966, though, that the next mass shooting — or, at least, the next incident that would readily be recognized as a mass shooting today — occurred.


In August of that year, a 25-year-old man named Charles Whitman went on a 96-minute shooting spree from an observation deck at the University of Texas-Austin, killing 17 people and wounding 31 others in an attack that sounds eerily reminiscent of the stories that you're all too used to hearing today.


The 2nd amendment is a huge impediment facing the ‘deep state’ and the NWO and they will stop at nothing to neuter its being.


The movie series “The Bourne Identity” is the story about mind control performed by the CIA to assassinate people. Very much on the mark. 


You can also research MkUltra.





I think the New World Order is on life support. The concept of one world, one government, one religion is not attainable at this time, mostly thanks to Russia, China, BRICS and the concept of GESARA, a world at peace. Who wouldn’t want to live in a world at peace? A world where everyone was considered an equal.  A world where people no-longer did without. A world where everyone’s needs were fulfilled. A world where decisions were not made based on greed but rather with compassion.


President Putin of Russia Made A Warning Speech To The New World Order Khazarian Mafia And All Of Their Cohorts…on March 3, 2022


“I’m tired today. I’m tired of everything.


I want to address the leaders of the world.


What happens to you?


Which evil plan are you designing?


You are people who are deliberately trying to reduce population.


They are doing this at the cost of the lives of innocent people.


O’tyrants of the world, I know your sinister plan to reduce the population of this planet. But today history will show you that collective wisdom and common sense are stronger!


We demand that you back down on your plan.


I stand here in peace today.


And we ask you to keep the minds of the youth and the oppressed in peace.


Take a firm step to see that I am aware of your plan.


Your policies should change immediately.


Your media needs to start telling the truth.


America and Europe, if you do not finish your plan, in addition to DIVINE WRATH, you must also face MY WRATH.








May 22-26 the DAVOS Group World Elites that control Blackrock, Vanguard, the Central Banking System, Big Tech and Pharma – the Cabal – were meeting in Switzerland.


With no A-listers, can Davos still play a part on the global stage?

This year’s meeting may just manage some climate progress, but many say the forum is irrelevant in a changed world


Larry Elliott

Sat 21 May 2022


There is, however, an alternative narrative. Davos has always been dedicated to globalisation and has long been keen on using the forum to tackle common problems such as global heating and inequality. But how will it cope with a fragmented world where globalisation is in retreat? Vladimir Putin was a keynote speaker at last year’s virtual Davos but with the war in Ukraine, no Russians have been invited this time. China’s president, Xi Jinping, gave a pro-globalisation address in Davos five years ago. It is unlikely he would make the same speech today.


A combination of pandemic and Putin has accelerated an already existing trend towards deglobalisation and that process – rather than the protesters outside the ring of steel – poses the biggest threat to the future of Davos.


A former UK cabinet minister – once a Davos regular – said the meeting had ceased to be relevant. “It has become ridiculous,” he said. “You have executives flying in to Switzerland in private jets, then pledging to plant millions of trees as a carbon offset.”









In the previous email you read:


     Angelo Cordevilla correctly observed in his article “American Exodus:”


     “The deplorables plainly stand no chance of dismantling the new American system. Corporate executives, not legislatures, governors, or presidents are the ones who decide what happens to the trillions of dollars created jointly by the Federal Reserve and Wall Street. They are the ones who regulate speech and attitudes, who for the most part decide who rises and who does not. And they are the part of the oligarchy most insulated from republican institutions.”


     According to Cordevilla, the solution is, “Don’t wait for the oligarchy to let you in. Just walk away.”


He is saying walk away from CORPORATE AMERICA and here is a prime example of why.


     QUOTE: Auto insurance company State Farm has partnered with the “GenderCool Project” to supply transgender books for students as young as kindergarten to schools in Florida.


“The three books, A Kids Book About Being Transgender, A Kids Book About Being Non-Binary, and A Kids Book About Being Inclusive, contain various descriptions about gender and identity meant to disprove the notion that gender is the same as biological sex and establish that it is therefore changeable,” the Washington Examiner reports. “The GenderCool Project markets the ‘three book bundle’ to children ages 5 and over, a fact noted in the whistleblower email.”


This gross and blatant attempt to indoctrinate our children by @StateFarm is shameless and consumers should be aware a company founded on family values is now encouraging five-year-old children to question their gender. END QUOTE


Walk away from big box stores. Walk away from the big tech corporations. Walk away from professional sports, all of them. Walk away from modern day entertainment. Walk away from all mainstream media sources. Walk away from the giant telecom companies.  And do not financially support ANY political party.


I realize in today’s world this would be nearly impossible, but you can throttle back. I do not watch professional sports of any kind. I watch very little television except for old western movies and cooking. Occasionally I may watch a few minutes of Tucker Carlson on Fox. I get my news from alternative sources; Revolver, Gateway Pundit. I only use a cell phone during emergencies like evacuations. I have not donated to any political campaign since Newt Gingrich. I have played in excess of 25,000 games of solitaire though. I try very hard NOT to give my money or time to Corporate America. I have not been in a Wal-Mart store since 2020, however, I have ordered a very small number of items on-line.


The WEF is out to destroy America and you can do something about it.


War requires sacrifice. They are determined to make us and ours serfs. A little pain now may bring joy to ours in the future.


Press on Patriots.





As the left loses more and more control, of the political issues we face, to those who do not conform to their way of thinking, it seems to me, that their behavior becomes more and more reckless. Almost unhinged. Hateful. And it appears they are being encouraged and led by those who want to foment that behavior.


Because of that, here, I will say, I believe many of them are victims. I believe; they are the victims of a segment of our society that has manipulated and influenced their thoughts and actions during their lifetime. I firmly believe they have been brainwashed by the educational, corporate and political elites of our society that promoted the path they are following. I will guess, that the type of behavior we are seeing is because they are so heavily invested in the ideals that they have been taught. And because of that, it seems to me, they may be inclined to do whatever they deem necessary to prevent those ideals from being discarded and found irrelevant by a society they hold in contempt. Further, to me, it seems the rabid believers self-project that if that happened, it would be unbearable, and I assume it would be such because, if and when that happened, they would be dealing with the rejection of their whole being, that being who they are and what they have lived and believed religiously the majority of their life.


We have seen the left lie, cheat and steal just to promote and protect their beliefs.


We have witnessed the left’s behavior when confronted by a single  opposing view, such as free speech. Generally it is anything but rational. There is no negotiating or debating. Mostly it dissolves into an ‘in-your- face’ shouting match.


So, now imagine their reaction to having their entire belief system turned upside down and rejected by society.


This could, it seems to me, lead to some real mental crisis situations.






Are the one world governance, NWO folks, trying to set the USA up for a move that could nullify the 2nd amendment and steal our sovereignty? It seems so.


Former Congresswoman and now Dean Michele Bachmann is concerned that is a possibility.


She writes: “The proposed Biden amendments to the WHA strengthen the WHO by allowing the Director-General to unilaterally declare a public health emergency of international concern, or intermediate, or regional without the consent of a UN member state.”


That would relinquish our sovereignty or right of self-determination on such issues..


She further writes:


“Any “affected” state can accuse a UN member state of an international health problem, (can anyone say climate change, gun violence, or white nationalism)?


Clearly, the globalists want the WHO to have even more emergency powers over our healthcare. They want the WHO to make declarations and statements that will be treated as having the effect of law, even if WHO pronouncements don’t have the force of law.


If WHO declarations are followed and enforced as law by the Biden administration, (as this administration has done for 2 1/2 years), then we know from experience the Biden administration will do as they are told by WHO.


America’s constitution exists, but for 2 1/2 years it was ignored by Congress, the president, and many justices. That was our experience in the U.S. with WHO.


Presidents Trump and Biden both exercised broad powers based upon emergency declarations. The same will be true in practice by UN member states if they, like the Biden administration, willingly choose to relinquish national decision-making over healthcare to the WHO.”




“The fact is President Trump withdrew the US out of WHO, and Biden signed us back into WHO. That is where it begins.


It appears the information on the “WHO Agreement” is being suppressed, and the result of that are conflicting reports. So, I went digging deeper for the hard facts. For those in the United States of America – the fact is we are a member of the UN and there does not need to be a vote in the senate and the congress to pass the agreement changes in the UN WHO, the voting will be held by the UN Assembly on May 22 thru 28th, 2022. There must be a 2/3rds majority vote in support of the agreement by the UN member nations at the Assembly for it to pass. The ones to address are those voting on this at the UN. However, we see at home…another issue and that is one of treason!


Us losing our freedom and our country has been by design decades in the making.


God help us save our republic







“The goal of any dissident writer is to crack open the doors of perception enough to let a little light in – so that hopefully the seeds of a political reawakening will be planted.”



ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI, National Security Advisor to President CARTER, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member, first director of the Trilateral Commission and an American.


He writes of a society controlled by power elite in his 1970 book, BETWEEN TWO AGES: AMERICA'S ROLE IN THE TECHNETRONIC ERA.  You will find much of today’s world in his writings of 50 plus years ago.


“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.


It is likely that before long the social elites of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and outlook....


The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty. ... In the economic-technological field, some international cooperation has already been achieved, but further progress will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position.


Mika Brzezinski/MSNBC

Daughter of  Zbigniew, part of operation mockingbird responding to

President Trump

“He is trying to undermine the media and trying to make up his own facts.  And it could be that while unemployment and the economy worsens, he could have undermined the messaging so much that he can actually control exactly what people think.  And that, that is our job.” Feb. 22, 2017 Mika Brzezinski


Winter, 1992-93 -- The CFR's Foreign Affairs publishes Empowering the United Nations by U.N. Secretary General Boutros-Boutros Ghali, who asserts: "It is undeniable that the centuries-old doctrine of absolute and exclusive sovereignty no longer stands...Underlying the rights of the individual and the rights of peoples is a dimension of universal sovereignty that resides in all humanity...It is a sense that increasingly finds expression in the gradual expansion of international law...In this setting the significance of the United Nations should be evident and accepted."


July 18, 1993 -- CFR member and Trilateralist Henry Kissinger writes in the Los Angeles Times concerning NAFTA: "What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system...a first step toward a new world order."


August 23, 1993 -- Christopher Hitchens, Socialist friend of Bill Clinton when he was at Oxford University, says in a C-Span interview: " is, of course the case that there is a ruling class in this country, and that it has allies internationally."


October 30, 1993 -- Washington Post ombudsman Richard Harwood does an op-ed piece about the role of the CFR's media members: "Their membership is an acknowledgment of their ascension into the American ruling class [where] they do not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy for the United States; they help make it."


January/February, 1994 -- The CFR's Foreign Affairs prints an opening article by CFR Senior Fellow Michael Clough in which he writes that the "Wise Men" (e.g. Paul Nitze, Dean Acheson, George Kennan, and John J. McCloy) have: "assiduously guarded it [American foreign policy] for the past 50 years...They ascended to power during World War II...This was as it should be. National security and the national interest, they argued must transcend the special interests and passions of the people who make up America...How was this small band of Atlantic-minded internationalists able to triumph ...Eastern internationalists were able to shape and staff the burgeoning foreign policy institutions...As long as the Cold War endured and nuclear Armageddon seemed only a missile away, the public was willing to tolerate such an undemocratic foreign policy making system."


1994 -- In the Human Development Report, published by the UN Development Program, there was a section called "Global Governance For the 21st Century". The administrator for this program was appointed by Bill Clinton. His name is James Gustave Speth. The opening sentence of the report said: "Mankind's problems can no longer be solved by national government. What is needed is a World Government. This can best be achieved by strengthening the United Nations system."


1995 -- The State of the World Forum took place in the fall of this year, sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation located at the Presidio in San Francisco. Foundation President Jim Garrison chairs the meeting of who's-who from around the world including Margaret Thatcher, Maurice Strong, George Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev and others. Conversation centers around the oneness of mankind and the coming global government. However, the term "global governance" is now used in place of "new world order" since the latter has become a political liability, being a lightning rod for opponents of global government.


1996 -- The United Nations 420-page report Our Global Neighborhood is published. It outlines a plan for "global governance," calling for an international Conference on Global Governance in 1998 for the purpose of submitting to the world the necessary treaties and agreements for ratification by the year 2000.


1. Agenda 21 is real, therefore, the blue print to change the world is real.

2. Agenda 21 was designed and promoted by the powers of the New World Order.

3. Agenda 21 does not conform to the U.S. Constitution or our Declaration of Independence

4. Nancy Pelosi shepherded the resolution to adopt the principals of Agenda 21 through Congress in 1992/93.

5. President Clinton, by E.O., set-up the President’s Council of Sustainable Development (PCSD) to find a way to make this blueprint the guide for the 21st Century inside our Constitutional Republic.

6. Under direction, the UN set up the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) which was designed to infiltrate and manipulate local governments. (When I last checked, Lake County was not a member. However, many of our neighbors are.)





Sniper Wali, the famous Canadian mercenary, has fled war-torn Ukraine, after claiming to have nearly lost his life in the war "several times." Sniper Wali flew down to Ukraine two months ago after responding to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's call to join the fight against Russia.


The 40-year-old former soldier was working as a computer programmer when he left his job and family behind to join the International Legion of Territorial Defense of Ukraine.


Though he wanted to keep helping Ukrainians, Wali said he "pushed his luck." "I have no injuries. I say to myself: how far can I roll the dice? I don't want to lose what I have here," said Wali, often described as the world's deadliest sniper.


The sniper also had a "rather disappointing" assessment of the deployment of Western volunteer fighters. Wali, along with several other fighters, joined the Norman Brigade, a private volunteer unit based for several months in Ukraine, led by a former Quebec soldier. However, a dissent broke out and a large number of volunteers quit Norman Brigade.


"Many volunteer fighters expect it to be turnkey, but war is the opposite, it's a terrible disappointment," added Wali, adding that finding a gun itself was a hard task. "You had to know someone who knew someone who told you that in some old barbershop they would give you an AK-47," he said.


"Many arrive in Ukraine with their chests bulging, but they leave with their tails between their legs," Wali told the news outlet.


Scott Ritter - Ukraine & Russia, is one side winning?






Things that make you go, hmmm?








The Western World has a credibility problem, when it comes to Ukraine: President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Burisma, Victoria Newland, the State Department, the color revolution of 2014, Oligarchs and billions of your dollars, with more on the way.


You want to know what is holding back globalization, the NWO and WEF’s ‘Great Reset”? All the people we are supposed to hate, specifically, Russia and China, the deep state’s boogie-men.


Even the CEO of Blackrock admitted as much in a letter to shareholders.


Every since VP Joe Biden, Victoria Newland and the State Department fomented a color revolution in Ukraine, ousting a pro-Russia government and replacing it with a pro-western government, it has been a place of conflict and violence even with and after western approval of Minsk 1 and 2 to which Ukraine agreed. But,…  Ukraine never held up their end of the agreement. Instead, Ukraine harbored and weaponized, without doubt, Nazism, the fascist scourge of our world, and turned them loose on ethnic Russians in the Donbas region of Ukraine.


If you only listen to the MSM you are convinced Russia is bad. Russia is committing atrocities. Russia is bad, bad, bad and Ukraine is a poor victim. Well, yes, the Ukrainian people are victims, victims of the West’s plan for world domination, the New World Order and its ‘Great Reset’ where everyone would become slaves to a new world order.


It's time for us to admit:


Our country of today, the USA, is not the country of our Founders. It is not the country we were taught it was in school. The United States of America was hi-jacked decades ago and that is why things are not right and if you are honest with yourself, you will admit you see this. You’ve had questions before. You’ve wondered why reality did not conform to what you were taught. Equal justice under the law. For who? Due process. For who?


Under our current leadership, our country is taking orders from those at the top of the New World Order, the WEF and the Devos group with their Agenda 21, Paris Accords and COVID-19 pandemic directions.


One message, one drummer, one cadence, one lockstep.





EVERY MINUTE OF EVERY DAY, everywhere on the planet, dozens of companies — largely unregulated, little scrutinized — are logging the movements of tens of millions of people with mobile phones and storing the information in gigantic data files. The Times Privacy Project obtained one such file, by far the largest and most sensitive ever to be reviewed by journalists. It holds more than 50 billion location pings from the phones of more than 12 million Americans as they moved through several major cities, including Washington, New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles.


THE DATA REVIEWED BY TIMES OPINION didn’t come from a telecom or giant tech company, nor did it come from a governmental surveillance operation. It originated from a location data company, one of dozens quietly collecting precise movements using software slipped onto mobile phone apps. You’ve probably never heard of most of the companies — and yet to anyone who has access to this data, your life is an open book. They can see the places you go every moment of the day, whom you meet with or spend the night with, where you pray, whether you visit a methadone clinic, a psychiatrist’s office or a massage parlor.


It doesn’t take much imagination to conjure the powers such always-on surveillance can provide an authoritarian regime like China’s. Within America’s own representative democracy, citizens would surely rise up in outrage if the government attempted to mandate that every person above the age of 12 carry a tracking device that revealed their location 24 hours a day. Yet, in the decade since Apple’s App Store was created, Americans have, app by app, consented to just such a system run by private companies. Now, as the decade ends, tens of millions of Americans, including many children, find themselves carrying spies in their pockets during the day and leaving them beside their beds at night — even though the corporations that control their data are far less accountable than the government would be.


“The seduction of these consumer products is so powerful that it blinds us to the possibility that there is another way to get the benefits of the technology without the invasion of privacy. But there is,” said William Staples, founding director of the Surveillance Studies Research Center at the University of Kansas. “All the companies collecting this location information act as what I have called Tiny Brothers, using a variety of data sponges to engage in everyday surveillance.”


NOW you can see how 2000 MULES was accomplished.


Watch 2000 MULES NOW






by Eva Fox May 07, 2022


Klaus Schwab’s daughter encourages use of ‘Great Reset’ tactics to fight climate change

' ... I see it as a tremendous opportunity to really have this Great Reset,' Nicole Schwab said.


Mon May 2, 2022


(LifeSiteNews) — Nicole Schwab, the daughter of World Economic Forum chairman Klaus Schwab, says global efforts need to be directed at climate change to further the implementation of the “Great Reset.”


The Great Reset is a radical socialist plan designed by global elites that “seeks to ‘push the reset button’ on the global economy” and establish a radical New World Order that seems to closely emulate many aspects of the Chinese Social Credit System.


In fact, Klaus Schwab himself has praised Chinese Communist leader Xi Jinping while admiring the so-called success his totalitarian regime has had in creating a “prosperous” society.


While the Great Reset extensively mentions the COVID pandemic and how the global elite have been able to capitalize on the so-called crisis to further their revolutionary agenda, climate change has also been a primary topic of interest for the group.


In an article penned by Klaus Schwab about the Great Reset, he makes similar statements to those of his daughter by mentioning how a focus on “sustainability” through the use of “environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics” is key to furthering his organization’s agenda.


ESG metrics, which allot a score to a company based on carbon footprint, political alignment, and the racial and sexual “diversity” of its staff, among other factors, have already been implemented in large corporations throughout the western world.


In February, The Impact Investor noted that “stakeholders pay attention to the effect a company has on the environment,” while “third parties and even the government” are “also keeping track.”


The Impact Investor also noted that, like something out of “China,” the people behind ESG scores are already working on scoring individual people as well as corporations, with everything from purchasing firearms, alcohol, clothing, and one’s political affiliation, being a potential relevant factor to one’s social ranking.


“The purpose behind each person being assigned an individual ESG score is to help reward actions that will help move the world towards sustainability,” the article explains.


“[T]here will come a time where too low of a score can result in denials for loans or services similar to the way credit scores currently function.”









Published July 23, 2020


While it hasn’t gained widespread attention, the Great Reset is perhaps the biggest danger to capitalism and individual rights since the collapse of the Soviet Union.


What is the Great Reset? Simply put, it’s a growing movement backed by many of the world’s most powerful business leaders, government officials and left-wing activists that aims to “push the reset button” on the global economy.  it would destroy the current capitalist system and replace it with progressive and modern socialist systems, with a special emphasis placed on eco-socialist policies like those contained in the Green New Deal.


“Every country, from the United States to China, must participate [in the Great Reset], and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism,” wrote Klaus Schwab, the head of the World Economic Forum (WEF), in a recent article for WEF’s website.


Policy ideas offered by “Great Reset” advocates include government-provided basic income programs, universal health care, massive tax increases and the Green New Deal.


Sources tell FOX Business’ Charlie Gasparino that traders are watching for clues on who presumptive Democratic candidate Joe Biden might appoint to key economic jobs.


Schwab, the World Economic Forum and international figures like Prince Charles are currently leading the campaign for a Great Reset.


For example, at a campaign event on July 9, Biden said we need to end the “era of shareholder capitalism,” a major part of the Great Reset proposal that would alter how companies are evaluated, elevating social justice causes and climate change concerns over property rights.


Instead of worrying about profits, opponents of “shareholder capitalism” argue companies should be forced to focus on “stakeholders,” which is just another way of saying “the collective.”


Klaus Schwab and other Great Reset leaders have been making arguments against “shareholder capitalism” for literally decades, going all the way back to the 1970s. But only recently, spurred by concerns about climate change and wealth inequality, has it gained any traction.


The connection between Biden and the radical Great Reset is best seen by examining Biden’s new “Build Back Better” plan. According to Biden’s website, his Build Back Better proposal would “launch a national effort aimed at creating the jobs we need to build a modern, sustainable infrastructure now and deliver an equitable clean energy future.”


The focus of Biden’s proposal is the destruction of the modern energy industry, which Biden wants to replace with “renewable” energy sources like wind and solar.


Sources tell FOX Business’ Charlie Gasparino that the Biden campaign is looking for vice presidential candidate that will ‘do no harm.’


Biden’s plan calls for shifting the entire electric grid to “green” sources by just 2035, a wildly unrealistic goal that would have a catastrophic impact on the economy.


The Build Back Better plan comes straight from the Great Reset’s playbook. Great Reset supporters, especially the World Economic Forum, have been calling for some variation of a “Build Back Better” plan for years, often using those exact words in WEF materials.


In fact, as recently as July 13, the World Economic Forum promoted “building back better” through “green” infrastructure programs as part of the Great Reset in an article titled “To build back better, we must reinvent capitalism. Here’s how.”


“An inclusive and green recovery is vital if we are to create more resilient economies and a world in which business can thrive, not just now but long into the future,” the authors wrote, adding later, “A true recovery from COVID-19 will not be about putting things back together the way they were: we need to ‘build back better,’ to ‘reset,’ if we are to address the deep systemic vulnerabilities the pandemic has exposed.”


Similarly, in April, the World Economic Forum published an article titled “How to build back better after COVID-19,” in which the writer said businesses that receive public financing “must invest in low-carbon solutions that create new jobs.”


“Companies should prioritize investments in technologies, products and services that create more jobs and reduce emissions,” the author added.


“Some examples include investments in retrofitting of buildings, in renewable energies, and in achieving mass production and economies of scale in technologies that can decarbonize heavy industries.”


This is exactly what Biden’s “Build Back Better” plan calls for.


There are numerous other examples, too. For several years, WEF and its allies have been talking about “building back better.”


It can’t be a coincidence that Biden is now using that exact language while calling for nearly identical policies. Biden is clearly taking his cues from the World Economic Forum and other supporters of the Great Reset.


This won’t come as a surprise for those who have been following the Great Reset closely. John Kerry, a big proponent of the Great Reset, was tasked with co-chairing (alongside socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) the committee that helped Biden create his “Build Back Better” plan.


Great Reset supporters have tried to promote their proposal as a new kind of capitalism, but the truth is, it’s a fundamentally socialistic system because it would put the collective in control of most economic activity and impose a number of social justice reforms meant to “rebalance economies” and redistribute wealth around the world.


Great Reset supporters only use the word “capitalism” to make it more appealing to people in America and abroad who know that socialism has failed spectacularly in the past.


Many of the specific details of the Great Reset won’t be completely rolled out until January 2021, when the World Economic Forum will meet with left-wing activists from 400 cities around the world at an event in Davos, Switzerland, but the main purpose of the proposal is clear—tearing down the modern capitalist economy—and Biden seems to be going all-in on these dangerous ideas.


We cannot afford to give supporters of the Great Reset an opportunity to usher in their twenty-first century brand of socialism. We must fight back now, before it’s too late.





Capitalism is the only politico-economic system based on the doctrine of individual rights. This means that capitalism recognizes that each and every person is the owner of his own life, and has the right to live his life in any manner he chooses as long as he does not violate the rights of others.


Through upholding individual rights, capitalism recognizes the fact that each and every human being must use his own mind to grasp reality and act accordingly to better his own life. Capitalism is the only political system that is based upon man's true nature as a being that possesses the faculty of reason -- capitalism is the only system that recognizes that human beings can think. Indeed, individual rights and capitalism not only protect the individual person and property of each human being, but most importantly, they protect the individual mind of every human being.




Reality is Absolute

Reality is that which exists. It is absolute.

It is the standard of the true, the false, and the arbitrary.


Things are what they are, independent of our or anyone else's feelings, ideas, wishes, desires, and emotions.


Or, in the immortal words of Aristotle: A is A. To be, is to be something: finite, limited, and non-contradictory.


Reason is man's means of survival

Reason is man's only means of knowing reality, upon which his survival in reality depends.


Whether man is alone on a desert island, scurrying around with a pack of

savages,  or living in a city of billions: man must think -- and then act on his thinking, if life is his goal


The individual is sovereign

Man is a rational animal, and reality dictates that to survive, man must be rational -- by choice.


Man is a being of free will

Man can choose to think, drift, or evade -- but choose he must. His thoughts determine: his character, his values, his emotions, and his actions, and so his thoughts determine his destiny.


As reason is solely the attribute of an individual, and man's thinking determines his choices and actions, then each man is the master of his own destiny. The individual sovereign.


Man is an end in himself, and not a slave to the ends of 'society'

Man can gain immense values from living with other men in society -- namely

knowledge and trade -- if it is a human society.


A human society is one in which each man holds as an absolute: that every man is an end in  himself, and that other men are not his pawns, nor is he theirs.


Individualism is not opposed to man living in society

Individualism is opposed to man living in society as a slave.


To live in society man needs rights

To live rationally in society, man requires only one thing from his fellow men: freedom of action. Freedom of action does not mean freedom to act by

permission, which may be revoked at a dictator's, or a democratic mob's, whim, but the freedom to act as an absolute -- by right.


Man requires rights to those actions necessary to support his own life, the most fundamental right being the right to life, from which all other rights, including the right to liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness, derive.


Rights are moral principles...

Rights are moral principles defining a man's freedom of action in a social



Rights are inalienable -- they may not be morally infringed upon, i.e., a thief may rob you, but morally he is in the wrong, and you are in the right.


Rights are not guarantees to things, but only guarantees to freedom of action (right to liberty) -- and a guarantee to the results of those actions (right to property).


The only obligation one's rights impose on others is for them to leave you alone, i.e. free to act within your sphere of rights.


In a political context, freedom has only one meaning -- freedom from the initiation of force by other men.


Only by the initiation of force can a man be: prevented from speaking, or robbed of his possessions, or brutally murdered. Only by the initiation of force can a man's rights be violated. Only the initiation of force against a man can stop his mind, thus rendering it useless as a means of survival.








On March 25, 2005 I wrote and published a piece I titled: NAPA VALLEY ELITIST INSULT VETERANS and at that time I didn’t understand where this elitist attitude was coming from and how anyone could make fun of our Veterans and our Flag.


On November 16, 2006 I wrote and published a piece I titled: SMOKING CAUSES DEATH OF FREEDOM IN CALIFORNIA! I had no idea that banning smoking was a communitarian policy; I just knew it was the beginning of the end of freedom of individual choice as I knew it to be.


And as I floundered to find my way and to try and understand what was happening to my Country I ran across something called Communitarianism.


The New World Order’s (NWO) “Great Reset” is Communitarianism.


First, Communitarianism  is completely incompatible with religion - especially Christianity - in any way. The two simply cannot co-exist, because Communitarianism puts the common good ahead of any God-given rights including the right to live. We’re not just talking about abortion, but also elder care and end-of-life medical decisions.


Using 'environmental' concerns as the vehicle, the objective of the NWO is for global control over work, industry, energy, food supply, populations and money."


Communitarianism, the philosophy underpinning the NWO and its agenda, has been implemented by stealth over the past several years. One main tool has been Agenda 21.


Communitarianism is a type of supranational collectivism that uses social, economic, psychological and systems manipulation in preference to violence to achieve its objective.


Communitarianism is a strange mixture of capitalism and communism. Communitarians want social control in a collectivist and corporatist society;


A 'Big Brother knows best' type of philosophy.


Communitarians want... To create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society known as the 'New World Order' run by a small number of rich and powerful people with everyone else working as peasants; where group rights dominant over individual rights; where highly-taxed capitalism is merged with social collectivism, administered through NGOs and fake charities; where the 'reinvention of government' - replacing governments that operate under the rule of law, with a system of 'professional managers'; where this government rules by committee, with the committee deciding what is best for the 'common good'.


The Communitarians, through stealth, perseverance, duplicity, and subversion, have snatched individual-rights based democracy right out from under our noses, and replaced it with group-rights based Communitarianism - a trendy, innovative, and newish form of communism administered by foreign elitists.


They are convinced that a Communitarian system is 'better' for society - 'improved social cohesion' is the central tenet of their political ideology.


Communitarian policy has been seen as fascist corporatism with the primary difference, that instead of focusing on nation state’s own country and people, it propagates a supranational policy.


Communitarianism is aimed just like fascists, socialists and communists at the collective. The interests of the collective always prevail above the interests of the individual. Individuals must subjugate themselves to the 'common good'. Communitarians create imaginary problems such as global warming, terrorism suppression, and the bank crisis to force through their ideas. The most current crises, COVID-19, is one of their tools.


"In a communitarian society, which is inherently coercive, it isn't just the majority view that prevails and becomes policy, the majority view is the only one which can be spoken, the only one which can be even heard."


“Communitarianism is a collectivist philosophy that explicitly rejects individualism."


"Communitarianism is not about 'the common good'. It's about power and the absolute and dictatorial control of money and people - nothing more and nothing less."


In order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the nation state;


© Bill Wink August 3, 2011


Much of this information came from the STOP COMMON PURPOSE website



CINCO de MAYO, 2022







Article One, Section 8, of the United States Constitution places the District under the exclusive legislation of Congress.


      To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District as may, by Cession of Particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards and other needful Buildings;


On December 23, 1788, the Maryland General Assembly passed an act, allowing it to cede land for the federal district. The Virginia General Assembly followed suit on December 3, 1789. The signing of the federal Residence Act on July 16, 1790, mandated that the site for the permanent seat of government, "not exceeding ten miles square" (100 square miles), be located on the "river Potomack, at some place between the mouths of the Eastern-Branch and Connogochegue". The "Eastern-Branch" is known today as the Anacostia River. The Connogocheque (now known as Conococheague Creek) empties into the Potomac River upstream near Williamsport and Hagerstown, Maryland. The Residence Act limited to the Maryland side of the Potomac River the location of land that commissioners appointed by the President could acquire for federal use.


The Residence Act authorized the President to select the actual location of the site.  However, President George Washington wished to include the town of Alexandria, Virginia, within the federal district. To accomplish this, the boundaries of the federal district would need to encompass an area on the Potomac that was downstream of the mouth of the Eastern Branch.


The U.S. Congress amended the Residence Act in 1791 to permit Alexandria's inclusion in the federal district. However, some members of Congress had recognized that President George Washington, and his family, owned property in and near Alexandria, which was just seven miles upstream from Mount Vernon, Washington's home and plantation. The amendment, therefore, contained a provision that prohibited the "erection of the public buildings otherwise than on the Maryland side of the river Potomac".


Pursuant to the Residence Act, President Washington appointed three commissioners (Thomas Johnson, Daniel Carroll, and David Stuart) in 1791 to supervise the planning, design and acquisition of property in the federal district and capital city. In September 1791, using the toponym Columbia and the name of the president, the three commissioners agreed to name the federal district as the Territory of Columbia, and the federal city as the City of Washington.


In 1800, the seat of government was finally moved to the new city, and on February 27, 1801, the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801 placed the District under the jurisdiction of Congress. The act also organized the unincorporated territory within the District into two counties: the County of Washington on the northeast bank of the Potomac and the County of Alexandria on the southwest bank. On May 3, 1802, the City of Washington was granted a municipal government consisting of a mayor appointed by the President of the United States.




1. September 1791 the federal district became the Territory of Columbia, and the federal city as the City of Washington.

2. In 1800, the seat of government was finally moved to the new city

3. February 27, 1801, the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801 placed the District under the jurisdiction of Congress

3.a. The act also organized the unincorporated territory within the District into two counties: the County of Washington on the northeast bank of the Potomac and the County of Alexandria on the southwest bank.

4. May 3, 1802, the City of Washington was granted a municipal government consisting of a mayor appointed by the President of the United States.




What did it do?



People sometimes ask us:  “I read the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871; and, it seems like it only sets up a local government (like: Chicago or Seattle); so, I’m curious, how does that Act show that they instead formed a private corporation?


Our response:  If you were to take the Act out of its historical context and, from the present looking to the past, imagine who the parties involved are, we might agree.  However, it is highly unlikely that anyone can ever understand any historical effect by looking from the present to the past.  Therefore, we find the only way to truly understand that, or any, Act is to follow our: Standard for Review.


Following the Standard for Review, we can resolve the inquiry, not by delving into the Act in its entirety, but by simply discovering who the involved parties along with comparing a small portion of the historical background to the effects of the Act.  Because in 1871 Corp. U.S. did not exist, the date of the Act shows it was made by the original jurisdiction Congress (set by the Constitution for the United States of America).   The Act itself describes its venue as: “all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia”.  The District of Columbia was originally provided for in the Constitution for the United States of America (9-17-1787) at Article 1 Section 8, specifically in the last two clauses.


Then, on, July 16, 1790, in accord with the provisions of those clauses, the Territory was formed in the original District of Columbia Act, wherein the “ten mile square” territory was permanently created and made the permanent location of the country’s government, that is to say, the “territory” includes the actual government.  Under the Act, Congress also made the President the civic leader of the local government in all matters in said Territory.


Then on, February 27, 1801, under the second District of Columbia Act, two counties were formed (incorporated) and their respective officers and district judges were appointed.  Further, the established town governments of Alexandria, Georgetown and Washington were recognized as constituted and placed under the laws of the District, its judges, etc.  The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly called this act the “District of Columbia Organization Act” or the “Charter Act of the District of Columbia” and recognized it as the incorporation of the “municipality” known as the “District of Columbia”.


Then, on, March 3, 1801, a Supplementary Act to that last Act added the authority that the Marshals appointed by the respective District Court Judges collectively form a County Commission with the authority to appoint all officers as may be needed in similarity to the respective State officials in the states whence the counties Washington and Alexandria came, those being Maryland and Virginia, respectively.


According to the United States Supreme Court those charter acts (first acts) were the official incorporation of the formal government of the District of Columbia as chartered by Congress in accord with the Constitution’s provision.  Again, the Supreme Court called that body of government “a corporation”, with the right to sue and be sued.  Since 1801 The District of Columbia has been consistently recognized as a “municipal corporation” with its own government including (but not limited to) the right to sue and/or be sued as such.


That sets the basics for the first rule of our Standard for Review, ‘know the parties’.  Thus, what we have here presented is sufficient to show the basics of who the parties are as they related to resolving the answer to the question above.  We admonish everyone to prove the facts for themselves by their own supportive research.


The second rule from our Standard for Review is: “Then you must understand the environmental nature of the relationship.”


With that in mind let’s consider the events of the time: the Civil War had recently ended and the country was still under Lincoln’s Conscription Act (Martial Law).  Congress had at least three problems they could see no way to directly cure by following the laws of the land: they were out of funds, they had promised 40 acres of land to each slave that left the South to fight for the North and they had to reintegrate the South back into the Union; which they could not do without controlling the appointment of the Southern States Congressional members.  There were other problems but these three stand out from the rest.  Of course, for the purposes of this review, that is enough information about the environment of the relevant relationships; however, the more you study the historical events of this time the more obvious the relationships will become and the more proof you will amass to prove the facts of what actually happened.  In the interest of time and space in this response we will move on.


The last step of the  Standard for Review’s discovery process requires a review of the actual terms of the relationship. Thus, we review the first paragraph of the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 where:


Congress wrote:

     That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation


Knowing the government of the District of Columbia was already “created into a government” and was so formed into a municipal incorporation in 1801 under the District of Columbia Acts, we wonder, even with Congress’ constitutional authority to pass any law within the ten mile square of the District, how do you create, or incorporate, for the first time (which is what is meant by “organic”) a municipal government that has already been in existence as a municipal corporation for over 70 years?


The obvious answer is, “It’s impossible!”


There is no lawful way to pass a new “Organic Act” when the Charter Act is already in place, because the two words (organic and charter) have the same meaning—The First Act.  Even Congress cannot change history; though historians can make it appear to change; by rewriting it for those unwilling to study the past from its actual records.  The records speak for themselves only if we study them.


Respectfully, when you consider the historical facts, the only meaning left for the terms given in the opening paragraph of the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 (and that which follows) is, the municipal corporation that was created is a private corporation owned by the actual government.  Accordingly, the only government created in that Act was the government formed by the mere governing authority any private corporation has within the confines of managing its own corporate construct.  Thus, we call it: “Corp. U.S.”  We also note Congress reserved the right, granted them in the Constitution, to complete dictatorial authority over their Corp. U.S. construct, without regard for its internal operations or officers.  Thus, as a matter of law, Congress can use Corp. U.S. within the ten mile square of the District of Columbia as they see fit.


However, outside of that specifically defined venue, the only way they can exercise their respective authority is by agreement with other agreeable parties.  To that end, they formed their Social Security System (see: Corp. U.S. Mythology myths 8, 9 and 10).






Free counters provided by Andale