You are here because you are awake, or are waking-up, and
you have questions.
We are living through the “End Time’. This does not mean
the end of the world but the end of a cycle.
You are experiencing a world time that has not been seen
The Maya, Inca, Aztec, Hopi, Navajo, the Holy Bible and
prophets around the world prophesized this time would come.
The Mayan long count calendar covered a span of 5,125
years. It ended on the winter solstice, December 21st, 2012.
This 5,125 year cycle was ruled over by Satan and his
worshipers. That time has ended, however, evil will not just shrink into the
shadows and disappear, this is that time when the struggle between good and
evil is taking place. GOD will win but there will be a price. There will be
Evil knew this time would come, in fact, Project Looking Glass
projected anything they tried after 2012 would end in failure. We got Trump
During this time all evil will be exposed and if you think
about it, you have witnessed and experienced things you would have not
believed could happen 10-20 years ago.
This is the “Great Awakening’. (Not to be confused with
evil’s Great Reset.)
If you use a decerning eye you can see those who worship
Satan. They are evil and lack any compassion for their fellow man. They have
no conscious, no moral compass and will stop at nothing in order to gain
wealth and power. I present the Clintons and most politicians.
We will learn of the evil that has filled our society from
our government to our schools and yes, to our churches.
This evil goes by names like Khazarian Mafia, Illuminate,
Cabal, Deep State etc they all worship Satan and
there goal is the same, that is to dominate the world for Satan.
Evil’s power comes from control of the fiat money, Federal
Reserve, Central Bank etc., that’s why we will move to all asset backed money
around the world, to take away their control. It is also being said that all
monies will be equal. 1 for 1.
The next cycle for us is “On Earth as it is in Heaven”.
Humankind’s consciousness will be elevated to a new level
and we will live in a world where goodness abounds and evil is banned
forever. We will learn of our rightful place in the Universe and become aware
of who we are.
Donald Trump is a ‘good’ guy. Just like you, Donald Trump
was chosen to be who he is where he is at this time.
Seek the truth, for without truth there is no reality.
So, maybe you aren’t really awake yet. If so, go here first. This will
the left loses more and more control, of the political issues we face, to
those who do not conform to their way of thinking, it seems to me, that their
behavior becomes more and more reckless. Almost unhinged. Hateful. And it
appears they are being encouraged and led by those who want to foment that
of that, here, I will say, I believe many of them are victims. I believe;
they are the victims of a segment of our society that has manipulated and
influenced their thoughts and actions during their lifetime. I firmly believe
they have been brainwashed by the educational, corporate and political elites
of our society that promoted the path they are following. I will guess, that
the type of behavior we are seeing is because they are so heavily invested in
the ideals that they have been taught. And because of that, it seems to me,
they may be inclined to do whatever they deem necessary to prevent those
ideals from being discarded and found irrelevant by a society they hold in
contempt. Further, to me, it seems the rabid believers self-project that if
that happened, it would be unbearable, and I assume it would be such because,
if and when that happened, they would be dealing with the rejection of their
whole being, that being who they are and what they have lived and believed
religiously the majority of their life.
have seen the left lie, cheat and steal just to promote and protect their
have witnessed the left’s behavior when confronted by a singleopposing view, such as free speech.
Generally it is anything but rational. There is no negotiating or debating.
Mostly it dissolves into an ‘in-your- face’ shouting match.
now imagine their reaction to having their entire belief system turned upside
down and rejected by society.
could, it seems to me, lead to some real mental crisis situations.
MOVE TOWARD ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT
the one world governance, NWO folks, trying to set the USA up for a move that
could nullify the 2nd amendment and steal our sovereignty? It
Congresswoman and now Dean Michele Bachmann is concerned that is a
writes: “The proposed Biden amendments to the WHA strengthen the WHO by
allowing the Director-General to unilaterally declare a public health
emergency of international concern, or intermediate, or regional without the
consent of a UN member state.”
would relinquish our sovereignty or right of self-determination on such
“Any “affected” state can accuse a UN member state of an
international health problem, (can anyone say climate change, gun violence,
or white nationalism)?
Clearly, the globalists want the WHO to have even more emergency
powers over our healthcare. They want the WHO to make declarations and
statements that will be treated as having the effect of law, even if WHO
pronouncements don’t have the force of law.
If WHO declarations are followed and enforced as law by the Biden
administration, (as this administration has done for 2 1/2 years), then we
know from experience the Biden administration will do as they are told by
America’s constitution exists, but for 2 1/2 years it was ignored by
Congress, the president, and many justices. That was our experience in the
U.S. with WHO.
Presidents Trump and Biden both exercised broad powers based upon
emergency declarations. The same will be true in practice by UN member states
if they, like the Biden administration, willingly choose to relinquish
national decision-making over healthcare to the WHO.”
DIANNE MARSHALL writes:
“The fact is President Trump withdrew the US out of WHO, and Biden
signed us back into WHO. That is where it begins.
It appears the information on the “WHO Agreement” is being
suppressed, and the result of that are conflicting reports. So, I went
digging deeper for the hard facts. For those in the United States of America
– the fact is we are a member of the UN and there does not need to be a vote
in the senate and the congress to pass the agreement changes in the UN WHO,
the voting will be held by the UN Assembly on May 22 thru 28th, 2022. There
must be a 2/3rds majority vote in support of the agreement by the UN member
nations at the Assembly for it to pass. The ones to address are those voting
on this at the UN. However, we see at home…another issue and that is one of
losing our freedom and our country has been by design decades in the making.
help us save our republic
ALL BY DESIGN
LEADERS HAVE PLANNED ON BETRAYING US FOR DECADES
DAVE MCGOWAN WROTE:
“The goal of any dissident
writer is to crack open the doors of perception enough to let a little light
in – so that hopefully the seeds of a political reawakening will be planted.”
BRZEZINSKI, National Security Advisor to President CARTER, Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR) member, first director of the Trilateral Commission and an
writes of a society controlled by power elite in his 1970 book, BETWEEN TWO
AGES: AMERICA'S ROLE IN THE TECHNETRONIC ERA.You will find much of today’s world in his writings of 50 plus years
“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more
controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite,
unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert
almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date
complete files containing even the most personal information about the
citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the
It is likely that before long the social elites of most of the more
advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and
The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty. ... In the economic-technological field, some
international cooperation has already been achieved, but further progress
will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to
shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some
consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position.
ofZbigniew, part of operation
mockingbird responding to
“He is trying to undermine the media and trying to make up his own
facts.And it could be that while
unemployment and the economy worsens, he could have undermined the messaging
so much that he can actually control exactly what people think.And that, that is our job.” Feb. 22, 2017 Mika Brzezinski
1992-93 -- The CFR's Foreign Affairs publishes Empowering the United Nations
by U.N. Secretary General Boutros-Boutros Ghali,
who asserts: "It is undeniable that the centuries-old doctrine of
absolute and exclusive sovereignty no longer stands...Underlying the
rights of the individual and the rights of peoples is a dimension of
universal sovereignty that resides in all humanity...It is a sense that
increasingly finds expression in the gradual expansion of international
law...In this setting the significance of the United Nations should be
evident and accepted."
18, 1993 -- CFR member and Trilateralist Henry Kissinger writes in the Los
Angeles Times concerning NAFTA: "What Congress will have before it is
not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new
international system...a first step toward a new world order."
23, 1993 -- Christopher Hitchens, Socialist friend of Bill Clinton when he
was at Oxford University, says in a C-Span interview: "...it is, of
course the case that there is a ruling class in this country, and that it has
30, 1993 -- Washington Post ombudsman Richard Harwood does an op-ed piece
about the role of the CFR's media members: "Their membership is an
acknowledgment of their ascension into the American ruling class [where] they
do not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy for the United States;
they help make it."
1994 -- The CFR's Foreign Affairs prints an opening article by CFR Senior
Fellow Michael Clough in which he writes that the "Wise Men" (e.g.
Paul Nitze, Dean Acheson, George Kennan, and John J. McCloy) have:
"assiduously guarded it [American foreign policy] for the past 50
years...They ascended to power during World War II...This was as it should be.
National security and the national interest, they argued must transcend the
special interests and passions of the people who make up America...How
was this small band of Atlantic-minded internationalists able to triumph
...Eastern internationalists were able to shape and staff the burgeoning
foreign policy institutions...As long as the Cold War endured and nuclear
Armageddon seemed only a missile away, the public was willing to tolerate
such an undemocratic foreign policy making system."
-- In the Human Development Report, published by the UN Development Program,
there was a section called "Global Governance For the 21st Century".
The administrator for this program was appointed by Bill Clinton. His name is
James Gustave Speth. The opening sentence of the
report said: "Mankind's problems can no longer be solved by national
government. What is needed is a World Government. This can best be achieved
by strengthening the United Nations system."
-- The State of the World Forum took place in the fall of this year,
sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation located at the Presidio in San
Francisco. Foundation President Jim Garrison chairs the meeting of
who's-who from around the world including Margaret Thatcher, Maurice Strong,
George Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev and others. Conversation centers around the
oneness of mankind and the coming global government.
However, the term "global governance" is now used in place of
"new world order" since the latter has become a political
liability, being a lightning rod for opponents of global government.
-- The United Nations 420-page report Our Global Neighborhood is published.
It outlines a plan for "global governance," calling for an
international Conference on Global Governance in 1998 for the purpose of
submitting to the world the necessary treaties and agreements for
ratification by the year 2000.
Agenda 21 is real, therefore, the blue print to change the world is real.
Agenda 21 was designed and promoted by the powers of the New World Order.
Agenda 21 does not conform to the U.S. Constitution or our Declaration of
Nancy Pelosi shepherded the resolution to adopt the principals of Agenda 21
through Congress in 1992/93.
President Clinton, by E.O., set-up the President’s Council of Sustainable
Development (PCSD) to find a way to make this blueprint the guide for the 21st
Century inside our Constitutional Republic.
Under direction, the UN set up the International Council for Local
Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI)
which was designed to infiltrate and manipulate local governments. (When I
last checked, Lake County was not a member. However, many of our neighbors
IN UKRAINE – A DIFFERENT PROSPECTIVE.
Wali, the famous Canadian mercenary, has fled war-torn Ukraine, after
claiming to have nearly lost his life in the war "several times."
Sniper Wali flew down to Ukraine two months ago after responding to Ukrainian
President Volodymyr Zelensky's call to join the fight against Russia.
40-year-old former soldier was working as a computer programmer when he left
his job and family behind to join the International Legion of Territorial
Defense of Ukraine.
he wanted to keep helping Ukrainians, Wali said he "pushed his
luck." "I have no injuries. I say to myself: how far can I roll the
dice? I don't want to lose what I have here," said Wali, often described
as the world's deadliest sniper.
sniper also had a "rather disappointing" assessment of the
deployment of Western volunteer fighters. Wali, along with several other
fighters, joined the Norman Brigade, a private volunteer unit based for
several months in Ukraine, led by a former Quebec soldier. However, a dissent
broke out and a large number of volunteers quit Norman Brigade.
volunteer fighters expect it to be turnkey, but war is the opposite, it's a
terrible disappointment," added Wali, adding that finding a gun itself
was a hard task. "You had to know someone who knew someone who told you
that in some old barbershop they would give you an AK-47," he said.
arrive in Ukraine with their chests bulging, but they leave with their tails
between their legs," Wali told the news outlet.
Ritter - Ukraine & Russia, is one side winning?
that make you go, hmmm?
Western World has a credibility problem, when it comes to Ukraine: President
Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Burisma, Victoria Newland, the State Department, the
color revolution of 2014, Oligarchs and billions of your dollars, with more
on the way.
want to know what is holding back globalization, the NWO and WEF’s ‘Great
Reset”? All the people we are supposed to hate, specifically, Russia and
China, the deep state’s boogie-men.
the CEO of Blackrock admitted as much in a letter to shareholders.
since VP Joe Biden, Victoria Newland and the State Department fomented a
color revolution in Ukraine, ousting a pro-Russia government and replacing it
with a pro-western government, it has been a place of conflict and violence
even with and after western approval of Minsk 1 and 2 to which Ukraine
agreed. But,…Ukraine never held up
their end of the agreement. Instead, Ukraine harbored and weaponized, without
doubt, Nazism, the fascist scourge of our world, and turned them loose on
ethnic Russians in the Donbas region of Ukraine.
you only listen to the MSM you are convinced Russia is bad. Russia is
committing atrocities. Russia is bad, bad, bad and Ukraine is a poor victim. Well,
yes, the Ukrainian people are victims, victims of the West’s plan for world
domination, the New World Order and its ‘Great Reset’ where everyone would
become slaves to a new world order.
time for us to admit:
country of today, the USA, is not the country of our Founders. It is not the
country we were taught it was in school. The United States of America was
hi-jacked decades ago and that is why things are not right and if you are
honest with yourself, you will admit you see this. You’ve had questions
before. You’ve wondered why reality did not conform to what you were taught.
Equal justice under the law. For who? Due process. For who?
our current leadership, our country is taking orders from those at the top of
the New World Order, the WEF and the Devos group with their Agenda 21, Paris
Accords and COVID-19 pandemic directions.
message, one drummer, one cadence, one lockstep.
MINUTE OF EVERY DAY, everywhere on the planet, dozens of companies — largely
unregulated, little scrutinized — are logging the movements of tens of
millions of people with mobile phones and storing the information in gigantic
data files. The Times Privacy Project obtained one such file, by far the
largest and most sensitive ever to be reviewed by journalists. It holds more
than 50 billion location pings from the phones of more than 12 million
Americans as they moved through several major cities, including Washington,
New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles.
DATA REVIEWED BY TIMES OPINION didn’t come from a telecom or giant tech
company, nor did it come from a governmental surveillance operation. It
originated from a location data company, one of dozens quietly collecting
precise movements using software slipped onto mobile phone apps. You’ve
probably never heard of most of the companies — and yet to anyone who has
access to this data, your life is an open book. They can see the places you
go every moment of the day, whom you meet with or spend the night with, where
you pray, whether you visit a methadone clinic, a psychiatrist’s office or a
doesn’t take much imagination to conjure the powers such always-on surveillance
can provide an authoritarian regime like China’s. Within America’s own
representative democracy, citizens would surely rise up in outrage if the
government attempted to mandate that every person above the age of 12 carry a
tracking device that revealed their location 24 hours a day. Yet, in the
decade since Apple’s App Store was created, Americans have, app by app,
consented to just such a system run by private companies. Now, as the decade
ends, tens of millions of Americans, including many children, find themselves
carrying spies in their pockets during the day and leaving them beside their
beds at night — even though the corporations that control their data are far
less accountable than the government would be.
seduction of these consumer products is so powerful that it blinds us to the
possibility that there is another way to get the benefits of the technology
without the invasion of privacy. But there is,” said William Staples,
founding director of the Surveillance Studies Research Center at the
University of Kansas. “All the companies collecting this location information
act as what I have called Tiny Brothers, using a variety of data sponges to
engage in everyday surveillance.”
THE GREAT RESET, YOU WILL HAVE A PERSONAL ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND
URGES LARGE FUNDS TO STOP MISLEADING INVESTORS & CHANGE THEIR ESG
VALUATION OF COMPANIES
Eva Fox May 07, 2022
Schwab’s daughter encourages use of ‘Great Reset’ tactics to fight climate
... I see it as a tremendous opportunity to really have this Great Reset,'
Nicole Schwab said.
May 2, 2022
— Nicole Schwab, the daughter of World Economic Forum chairman Klaus Schwab,
says global efforts need to be directed at climate change to further the
implementation of the “Great Reset.”
Great Reset is a radical socialist plan designed by global elites that “seeks
to ‘push the reset button’ on the global economy” and establish a radical New
World Order that seems to closely emulate many aspects of the Chinese
Social Credit System.
fact, Klaus Schwab himself has praised Chinese Communist leader Xi Jinping
while admiring the so-called success his totalitarian regime has had in
creating a “prosperous” society.
the Great Reset extensively mentions the COVID pandemic and how the global
elite have been able to capitalize on the so-called crisis to further their
revolutionary agenda, climate change has also been a primary topic of
interest for the group.
an article penned by Klaus Schwab about the Great Reset, he makes similar
statements to those of his daughter by mentioning how a focus on “sustainability”
through the use of “environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics”
is key to furthering his organization’s agenda.
metrics, which allot a score to a company based on carbon footprint,
political alignment, and the racial and sexual “diversity” of its staff,
among other factors, have already been implemented in large corporations
throughout the western world.
February, The Impact Investor noted that “stakeholders pay attention to the
effect a company has on the environment,” while “third parties and even the
government” are “also keeping track.”
Impact Investor also noted that, like something out of “China,” the people
behind ESG scores are already working on scoring individual people as well as
corporations, with everything from purchasing firearms, alcohol, clothing,
and one’s political affiliation, being a potential relevant factor to
one’s social ranking.
purpose behind each person being assigned an individual ESG score is to help
reward actions that will help move the world towards sustainability,” the
will come a time where too low of a score can result in denials for loans or
services similar to the way credit scores currently function.”
While it hasn’t gained widespread attention, the Great
Reset is perhaps the biggest danger to capitalism and individual rights since
the collapse of the Soviet Union.
What is the Great Reset? Simply put, it’s a
growing movement backed by many of the world’s most powerful business
leaders, government officials and left-wing activists that aims to “push the
reset button” on the global economy.it would destroy the current capitalist system and replace it with
progressive and modern socialist systems, with a special emphasis placed on
eco-socialist policies like those contained in the Green New Deal.
“Every country, from the United States to China,
must participate [in the Great Reset], and every industry, from oil and gas to
tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism,”
wrote Klaus Schwab, the head of the World Economic Forum (WEF), in a recent
article for WEF’s website.
Policy ideas offered by “Great Reset” advocates
include government-provided basic income programs, universal health care,
massive tax increases and the Green New Deal.
Sources tell FOX Business’ Charlie Gasparino that
traders are watching for clues on who presumptive Democratic candidate Joe
Biden might appoint to key economic jobs.
Schwab, the World Economic Forum and
international figures like Prince Charles are currently leading the campaign
for a Great Reset.
For example, at a campaign event on July 9, Biden
said we need to end the “era of shareholder capitalism,” a major part of the
Great Reset proposal that would alter how companies are evaluated, elevating
social justice causes and climate change concerns over property rights.
Instead of worrying about profits, opponents of
“shareholder capitalism” argue companies should be forced to focus on
“stakeholders,” which is just another way of saying “the collective.”
Klaus Schwab and other Great Reset leaders have
been making arguments against “shareholder capitalism” for literally decades,
going all the way back to the 1970s. But only recently, spurred by concerns
about climate change and wealth inequality, has it gained any traction.
The connection between Biden and the radical
Great Reset is best seen by examining Biden’s new “Build Back Better” plan.
According to Biden’s website, his Build Back Better proposal would “launch a
national effort aimed at creating the jobs we need to build a modern,
sustainable infrastructure now and deliver an equitable clean energy future.”
The focus of Biden’s proposal is the destruction of
the modern energy industry, which Biden wants to replace with “renewable”
energy sources like wind and solar.
Sources tell FOX Business’ Charlie Gasparino that
the Biden campaign is looking for vice presidential candidate that will ‘do
Biden’s plan calls for shifting the entire
electric grid to “green” sources by just 2035, a wildly unrealistic goal that
would have a catastrophic impact on the economy.
The Build Back Better plan comes straight from
the Great Reset’s playbook. Great Reset supporters, especially the World
Economic Forum, have been calling for some variation of a “Build Back Better”
plan for years, often using those exact words in WEF materials.
In fact, as recently as July 13, the World
Economic Forum promoted “building back better” through “green” infrastructure
programs as part of the Great Reset in an article titled “To build back
better, we must reinvent capitalism. Here’s how.”
“An inclusive and green recovery is vital if we
are to create more resilient economies and a world in which business can
thrive, not just now but long into the future,” the authors wrote, adding
later, “A true recovery from COVID-19 will not be about putting things back
together the way they were: we need to ‘build back better,’ to ‘reset,’ if we
are to address the deep systemic vulnerabilities the pandemic has exposed.”
Similarly, in April, the World Economic Forum published
an article titled “How to build back better after COVID-19,” in which the
writer said businesses that receive public financing “must invest in
low-carbon solutions that create new jobs.”
“Companies should prioritize investments in
technologies, products and services that create more jobs and reduce
emissions,” the author added.
“Some examples include investments in
retrofitting of buildings, in renewable energies, and in achieving mass
production and economies of scale in technologies that can decarbonize heavy
This is exactly what Biden’s “Build Back Better”
plan calls for.
There are numerous other examples, too. For
several years, WEF and its allies have been talking about “building back
It can’t be a coincidence that Biden is now using
that exact language while calling for nearly identical policies. Biden is
clearly taking his cues from the World Economic Forum and other supporters of
the Great Reset.
This won’t come as a surprise for those who have
been following the Great Reset closely. John Kerry, a big proponent of the
Great Reset, was tasked with co-chairing (alongside socialist Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez) the committee that helped Biden create his “Build Back Better”
Great Reset supporters have tried to promote
their proposal as a new kind of capitalism, but the truth is, it’s a
fundamentally socialistic system because it would put the collective in
control of most economic activity and impose a number of social justice
reforms meant to “rebalance economies” and redistribute wealth around the
Great Reset supporters only use the word
“capitalism” to make it more appealing to people in America and abroad who
know that socialism has failed spectacularly in the past.
Many of the specific details of the Great Reset
won’t be completely rolled out until January 2021, when the World Economic
Forum will meet with left-wing activists from 400 cities around the world at
an event in Davos, Switzerland, but the main purpose of the proposal is
clear—tearing down the modern capitalist economy—and Biden seems to be going
all-in on these dangerous ideas.
We cannot afford to give supporters of the Great
Reset an opportunity to usher in their twenty-first century brand of
socialism. We must fight back now, before it’s too late.
Capitalism is the only
politico-economic system based on the doctrine of individual rights. This means
that capitalism recognizes that each and every person is the owner of his own
life, and has the right to live his life in any manner he chooses as long as
he does not violate the rights of others.
Through upholding individual rights,
capitalism recognizes the fact that each and every human being must use his
own mind to grasp reality and act accordingly to better his own life.
Capitalism is the only political system that is based upon man's true nature
as a being that possesses the faculty of reason -- capitalism is the only
system that recognizes that human beings can think. Indeed, individual rights
and capitalism not only protect the individual person and property of each
human being, but most importantly, they protect the individual mind of every
THE INDIVIDUAL IS SOVEREIGN
Reality is Absolute
is that which exists. It is absolute.
is the standard of the true, the false, and the arbitrary.
are what they are, independent of our or anyone else's feelings, ideas, wishes,
desires, and emotions.
in the immortal words of Aristotle: A is A. To be, is to be something:
finite, limited, and non-contradictory.
Reason is man's means of survival
is man's only means of knowing reality, upon which his survival in reality
man is alone on a desert island, scurrying around with a pack of
savages,or living in a city of billions: man must
think -- and then act on his thinking, if life is his goal
The individual is sovereign
is a rational animal, and reality dictates that to survive, man must be
rational -- by choice.
Man is a being of free will
can choose to think, drift, or evade -- but choose he must. His thoughts
determine: his character, his values, his emotions, and his actions, and so
his thoughts determine his destiny.
reason is solely the attribute of an individual, and man's thinking
determines his choices and actions, then each man is the master of his own
destiny. The individual sovereign.
Man is an end in himself, and not a slave to the ends of 'society'
can gain immense values from living with other men in society -- namely
and trade -- if it is a human society.
human society is one in which each man holds as an absolute: that every man
is an end inhimself, and that other
men are not his pawns, nor is he theirs.
Individualism is not opposed to man living in society
is opposed to man living in society as a slave.
To live in society man needs rights
live rationally in society, man requires only one thing from his fellow men:
freedom of action. Freedom of action does not mean freedom to act by
which may be revoked at a dictator's, or a democratic mob's, whim, but the
freedom to act as an absolute -- by right.
requires rights to those actions necessary to support his own life, the most
fundamental right being the right to life, from which all other rights,
including the right to liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness,
Rights are moral principles...
are moral principles defining a man's freedom of action in a social
are inalienable -- they may not be morally infringed upon, i.e., a thief may
rob you, but morally he is in the wrong, and you are in the right.
are not guarantees to things, but only guarantees to freedom of action (right
to liberty) -- and a guarantee to the results of those actions (right to
only obligation one's rights impose on others is for them to leave you alone,
i.e. free to act within your sphere of rights.
a political context, freedom has only one meaning -- freedom from the
initiation of force by other men.
by the initiation of force can a man be: prevented from speaking, or robbed
of his possessions, or brutally murdered. Only by the initiation of force can
a man's rights be violated. Only the initiation of force against a man can
stop his mind, thus rendering it useless as a means of survival.
IF YOU WANT TO UNDERSTAND THE “GREAT RESET” YOU MUST FIRST UNDERSTAND
WHERE THERE IS NO ‘me’ THERE IS ONLY ‘we’.
March 25, 2005 I wrote and published a piece I titled: NAPA VALLEY ELITIST
INSULT VETERANS and at that time I didn’t understand where this elitist
attitude was coming from and how anyone could make fun of our Veterans and
November 16, 2006 I wrote and published a piece I titled: SMOKING CAUSES
DEATH OF FREEDOM IN CALIFORNIA! I had no idea that banning smoking was a
communitarian policy; I just knew it was the beginning of the end of freedom
of individual choice as I knew it to be.
as I floundered to find my way and to try and understand what was happening
to my Country I ran across something called Communitarianism.
New World Order’s (NWO) “Great Reset” is Communitarianism.
Communitarianism is completely incompatible with religion - especially
Christianity - in any way. The two simply cannot co-exist, because
Communitarianism puts the common good ahead of any God-given rights including
the right to live. We’re not just talking about abortion, but also elder care
and end-of-life medical decisions.
'environmental' concerns as the vehicle, the objective of the NWO is for
global control over work, industry, energy, food supply, populations and
the philosophy underpinning the NWO and its agenda, has been implemented by
stealth over the past several years. One main tool has been Agenda 21.
is a type of supranational collectivism that uses social, economic, psychological
and systems manipulation in preference to violence to achieve its objective.
is a strange mixture of capitalism and communism. Communitarians want social
control in a collectivist and corporatist society;
'Big Brother knows best' type of philosophy.
want... To create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society known as the
'New World Order' run by a small number of rich and powerful people with
everyone else working as peasants; where group rights dominant over
individual rights; where highly-taxed capitalism is merged with social
collectivism, administered through NGOs and fake charities; where the
'reinvention of government' - replacing governments that operate under the
rule of law, with a system of 'professional managers'; where this government
rules by committee, with the committee deciding what is best for the 'common
Communitarians, through stealth, perseverance, duplicity, and subversion,
have snatched individual-rights based democracy right out from under our
noses, and replaced it with group-rights based Communitarianism - a trendy,
innovative, and newish form of communism administered by foreign elitists.
are convinced that a Communitarian system is 'better' for society - 'improved
social cohesion' is the central tenet of their political ideology.
policy has been seen as fascist corporatism with the primary difference, that
instead of focusing on nation state’s own country and people, it propagates a
is aimed just like fascists, socialists and communists at the collective. The
interests of the collective always prevail above the interests of the
individual. Individuals must subjugate themselves to the 'common good'.
Communitarians create imaginary problems such as global warming, terrorism
suppression, and the bank crisis to force through their ideas. The most
current crises, COVID-19, is one of their tools.
a communitarian society, which is inherently coercive, it isn't just the
majority view that prevails and becomes policy, the majority view is the only
one which can be spoken, the only one which can be even heard."
is a collectivist philosophy that explicitly rejects individualism."
is not about 'the common good'. It's about power and the absolute and
dictatorial control of money and people - nothing more and nothing
order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the
of this information came from the STOP COMMON PURPOSE website
de MAYO, 2022
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA – ITS INCORPORATION – AND THE ORGANIC ACT OF
One, Section 8, of the United States Constitution places the District under
the exclusive legislation of Congress.
To exercise exclusive
Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District as may, by Cession of
Particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the
Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all
Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the
Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards and
other needful Buildings;
December 23, 1788, the Maryland General Assembly passed an act, allowing it to
cede land for the federal district. The Virginia General Assembly followed
suit on December 3, 1789. The signing of the federal Residence Act on July
16, 1790, mandated that the site for the permanent seat of government,
"not exceeding ten miles square" (100 square miles), be located on
the "river Potomack, at some place between the mouths of the
Eastern-Branch and Connogochegue". The "Eastern-Branch" is
known today as the Anacostia River. The Connogocheque (now known as
Conococheague Creek) empties into the Potomac River upstream near
Williamsport and Hagerstown, Maryland. The Residence Act limited to the
Maryland side of the Potomac River the location of land that commissioners
appointed by the President could acquire for federal use.
Residence Act authorized the President to select the actual location of the
site.However, President George
Washington wished to include the town of Alexandria, Virginia, within the
federal district. To accomplish this, the boundaries of the federal district
would need to encompass an area on the Potomac that was downstream of the
mouth of the Eastern Branch.
U.S. Congress amended the Residence Act in 1791 to permit Alexandria's
inclusion in the federal district. However, some members of Congress had
recognized that President George Washington, and his family, owned property
in and near Alexandria, which was just seven miles upstream from Mount
Vernon, Washington's home and plantation. The amendment, therefore, contained
a provision that prohibited the "erection of the public buildings
otherwise than on the Maryland side of the river Potomac".
to the Residence Act, President Washington appointed three commissioners
(Thomas Johnson, Daniel Carroll, and David Stuart) in 1791 to supervise the
planning, design and acquisition of property in the federal district and
capital city. In September 1791, using the toponym Columbia and the name of
the president, the three commissioners agreed to name the federal district as
the Territory of Columbia, and the federal city as the City of Washington.
1800, the seat of government was finally moved to the new city, and on
February 27, 1801, the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801 placed the
District under the jurisdiction of Congress. The act also organized the unincorporated
territory within the District into two counties: the County of Washington on
the northeast bank of the Potomac and the County of Alexandria on the
southwest bank. On May 3, 1802, the City of Washington was granted a
municipal government consisting of a mayor appointed by the President of the
September 1791 the federal district became the Territory of Columbia, and the
federal city as the City of Washington.
In 1800, the seat of government was finally moved to the new city
February 27, 1801, the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801 placed the
District under the jurisdiction of Congress
The act also organized the unincorporated territory within the District into
two counties: the County of Washington on the northeast bank of the Potomac
and the County of Alexandria on the southwest bank.
May 3, 1802, the City of Washington was granted a municipal government
consisting of a mayor appointed by the President of the United States.
response:If you were to take the Act
out of its historical context and, from the present looking to the past,
imagine who the parties involved are, we might agree.However, it is highly unlikely that anyone
can ever understand any historical effect by looking from the present to the
past.Therefore, we find the only way
to truly understand that, or any, Act is to follow our: Standard for Review.
the Standard for Review, we can resolve the inquiry, not by delving into the
Act in its entirety, but by simply discovering who the involved parties along
with comparing a small portion of the historical background to the effects of
the Act. Because in 1871 Corp. U.S. did
not exist, the date of the Act shows it was made by the original
jurisdiction Congress (set by the Constitution for the United States of
America).The Act itself describes
its venue as: “all that part of the territory of the United States included
within the limits of the District of Columbia”.The District of Columbia was originally
provided for in the Constitution for the United States of America (9-17-1787)
at Article 1 Section 8, specifically in the last two clauses.
on, July 16, 1790, in accord with the provisions of those clauses, the
Territory was formed in the original District of Columbia Act, wherein the
“ten mile square” territory was permanently created and made the permanent
location of the country’s government, that is to say, the “territory”
includes the actual government.Under
the Act, Congress also made the President the civic leader of the local
government in all matters in said Territory.
on, February 27, 1801, under the second District of Columbia Act, two
counties were formed (incorporated) and their respective officers and
district judges were appointed.Further, the established town governments of Alexandria, Georgetown
and Washington were recognized as constituted and placed under the laws of
the District, its judges, etc.The
United States Supreme Court has repeatedly called this act the “District of
Columbia Organization Act” or the “Charter Act of the District of Columbia”
and recognized it as the incorporation of the “municipality” known as the
“District of Columbia”.
on, March 3, 1801, a Supplementary Act to that last Act added the authority
that the Marshals appointed by the respective District Court Judges
collectively form a County Commission with the authority to appoint all
officers as may be needed in similarity to the respective State officials in
the states whence the counties Washington and Alexandria came, those being
Maryland and Virginia, respectively.
to the United States Supreme Court those charter acts (first acts) were the
official incorporation of the formal government of the District of Columbia
as chartered by Congress in accord with the Constitution’s provision.Again, the Supreme Court called that body
of government “a corporation”, with the right to sue and be sued.Since 1801 The District of Columbia has
been consistently recognized as a “municipal corporation” with its own
government including (but not limited to) the right to sue and/or be sued as
sets the basics for the first rule of our Standard for Review, ‘know the
parties’.Thus, what we have here
presented is sufficient to show the basics of who the parties are as they
related to resolving the answer to the question above.We admonish everyone to prove the facts for
themselves by their own supportive research.
second rule from our Standard for Review is: “Then you must understand the
environmental nature of the relationship.”
that in mind let’s consider the events of the time: the Civil War had
recently ended and the country was still under Lincoln’s Conscription Act
(Martial Law).Congress had at least
three problems they could see no way to directly cure by following the laws
of the land: they were out of funds, they had promised 40 acres of land to
each slave that left the South to fight for the North and they had to
reintegrate the South back into the Union; which they could not do without
controlling the appointment of the Southern States Congressional
members.There were other problems but
these three stand out from the rest.Of course, for the purposes of this review, that is enough information
about the environment of the relevant relationships; however, the more you study
the historical events of this time the more obvious the relationships will
become and the more proof you will amass to prove the facts of what actually
happened.In the interest of time and
space in this response we will move on.
last step of theStandard for Review’s
discovery process requires a review of the actual terms of the relationship.
Thus, we review the first paragraph of the District of Columbia Organic Act
of 1871 where:
That all that part of the territory
of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia
be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the
District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate
for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal
the government of the District of Columbia was already “created into a
government” and was so formed into a municipal incorporation in 1801 under
the District of Columbia Acts, we wonder, even with Congress’ constitutional
authority to pass any law within the ten mile square of the District, how do
you create, or incorporate, for the first time (which is what is meant by
“organic”) a municipal government that has already been in existence as a
municipal corporation for over 70 years?
obvious answer is, “It’s impossible!”
is no lawful way to pass a new “Organic Act” when the Charter Act is already
in place, because the two words (organic and charter) have the same
meaning—The First Act.Even Congress
cannot change history; though historians can make it appear to change; by
rewriting it for those unwilling to study the past from its actual
records.The records speak for
themselves only if we study them.
when you consider the historical facts, the only meaning left for the terms
given in the opening paragraph of the District of Columbia Organic Act of
1871 (and that which follows) is, the municipal corporation that was created
is a private corporation owned by the actual government.Accordingly, the only government created in
that Act was the government formed by the mere governing authority any
private corporation has within the confines of managing its own corporate
construct.Thus, we call it: “Corp.
U.S.”We also note Congress reserved
the right, granted them in the Constitution, to complete dictatorial
authority over their Corp. U.S. construct, without regard for its internal
operations or officers.Thus, as a
matter of law, Congress can use Corp. U.S. within the ten mile square of the
District of Columbia as they see fit.
outside of that specifically defined venue, the only way they can exercise
their respective authority is by agreement with other agreeable parties.To that end, they formed their Social
Security System (see: Corp. U.S. Mythology myths 8, 9 and 10).